internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...]
- From: Marcia <msmartin AT ccbeunet.br>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...]
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 11:49:54 -0300
>> I don't know much about the jury selection process
Me neither, and my guess is, neither do they!
I was called for jury duty last year, but I'm not a US citizen! I'm a legal
resident, and a tax payer, so I thought since I may need the justice system
some day, they could ask me to serve it too. But I did call first, to make
sure.
The lady told me I didn't have to go, the "invitation" had been a mistake.
So
I asked where they got my name from, and she said they get people's names
when
they register to vote.. so I said I'd never registered to vote, I can't vote
here! She didn't know what to say.
Marcia
Quoting Jim Allman <jim AT ibang.com>:
> On Jul 6, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Shea Tisdale wrote:
> > For at least 4 of the people on
> > that jury, that meant making a decision that would find their employer
> > guilty. And in 2 cases, that entity was the major client of a business
> > owned or operated by the juror. So even with some concern for
> > potential
> > reprisal, they made the decision they felt was appropriate given the
> > facts
> > of the case.
>
> Interest. I don't know much about the jury selection process, but I
> would've guessed these people would be ineligible due to conflicts of
> interest.
>
> =jimA=
>
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
> Jim Allman
> Interrobang Digital Media
> http://www.ibang.com/
> (919) 649-5760
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>
-------------------------------------------------
WebMail Litoral Internet
www.litoral.com.br
-
Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, DonBartholf, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, DonBartholf, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
B, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Steven Champeon, 07/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Don Rua, 07/02/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Shea Tisdale, 07/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], zman, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Jim Allman, 07/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Marcia, 07/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], matusiak, 07/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Steven Champeon, 07/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Shea Tisdale, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Steven Champeon, 07/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.