internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...]
- From: Jim Allman <jim AT ibang.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...]
- Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:22:19 -0400
On Jul 6, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Shea Tisdale wrote:
For at least 4 of the people on
that jury, that meant making a decision that would find their employer
guilty. And in 2 cases, that entity was the major client of a business
owned or operated by the juror. So even with some concern for potential
reprisal, they made the decision they felt was appropriate given the facts
of the case.
Interest. I don't know much about the jury selection process, but I would've guessed these people would be ineligible due to conflicts of interest.
=jimA=
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jim Allman
Interrobang Digital Media
http://www.ibang.com/
(919) 649-5760
-
Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, DonBartholf, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, DonBartholf, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
B, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Steven Champeon, 07/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Don Rua, 07/02/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Shea Tisdale, 07/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], zman, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Jim Allman, 07/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Marcia, 07/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], matusiak, 07/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Steven Champeon, 07/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Shea Tisdale, 07/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Steven Champeon, 07/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.