Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...]

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Jim Allman <jim AT ibang.com>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...]
  • Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 10:22:19 -0400

On Jul 6, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Shea Tisdale wrote:
For at least 4 of the people on
that jury, that meant making a decision that would find their employer
guilty. And in 2 cases, that entity was the major client of a business
owned or operated by the juror. So even with some concern for potential
reprisal, they made the decision they felt was appropriate given the facts
of the case.

Interest. I don't know much about the jury selection process, but I would've guessed these people would be ineligible due to conflicts of interest.

=jimA=

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Jim Allman
Interrobang Digital Media
http://www.ibang.com/
(919) 649-5760





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page