internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Alan MacHett" <machett AT ibiblio.org>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers][rant] ...now McD's
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 18:37:24 -0400 (EDT)
Trust me, I abhor McDonald's and the rest of corporate America, but on
such matters I side with Darwin (in favor of McD's, Philip Morris, and
Smith&Wesson). Stupidity is no excuse for compensation. A hot cup of
coffee is a hot cup of coffee, regardless of the exact measurement in
Centigrades or Kelvins. I don't know about you, but I would *never* put a
cup of hot coffee between my legs, even if I believed it wasn't *that*
hot. We should be letting these people eliminate themselves from the gene
pool; instead, we're giving them money for it.
-Alan
In reference to Joe Komenda's message:
> You are incorrect regarding the McDonald's lawsuit. From snopes.com:
>
> '...the "woman scalded by hot coffee" suit, which at first blush looked
> like the height of frivolity proved to be a perfectly legitimate action
> taken against a corporation that knew, thanks to a string of similar
> scaldings it had quietly been paying off, that its coffee was not just
> hot, but *dangerously* hot. The Association of Trial Lawyers of America
> provides an excellent description of this case."
>
> Note: descriptions of the woman's burns are quite graphic.
> http://tinyurl.com/58ul
>
> Sorry, that one is a pet peeve.
> Joe K
> ===================
> Alan MacHett wrote:
>
>> the good ol' U. S. of A.
>>
>> only in Amerika can you spill hot coffee on your crotch and win $3M in a
>> lawsuit.
>
-
[internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
[internetworkers] Re:[rant] legal outrage,
Joe Komenda, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers][rant] ...now McD's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers][rant] ...now McD's, Ian Meyer, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers][rant] ...now McD's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
Shea Tisdale, 07/01/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, DonBartholf, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, DonBartholf, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
B, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Steven Champeon, 07/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
[internetworkers] Re:[rant] legal outrage,
Joe Komenda, 07/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.