internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT mac.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers][rant] ...now McD's
- Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 19:13:44 -0400
As my grandma, who smoked most of her life, puts it...
Every time I lit up, there was always that Philip Morris man standing there with a gun to my head to make sure I did.
~ian
On Jul 1, 2004, at 6:37 PM, Alan MacHett wrote:
Trust me, I abhor McDonald's and the rest of corporate America, but on
such matters I side with Darwin (in favor of McD's, Philip Morris, and
Smith&Wesson). Stupidity is no excuse for compensation. A hot cup of
coffee is a hot cup of coffee, regardless of the exact measurement in
Centigrades or Kelvins. I don't know about you, but I would *never* put a
cup of hot coffee between my legs, even if I believed it wasn't *that*
hot. We should be letting these people eliminate themselves from the gene
pool; instead, we're giving them money for it.
-Alan
In reference to Joe Komenda's message:
You are incorrect regarding the McDonald's lawsuit. From snopes.com:
'...the "woman scalded by hot coffee" suit, which at first blush looked
like the height of frivolity proved to be a perfectly legitimate action
taken against a corporation that knew, thanks to a string of similar
scaldings it had quietly been paying off, that its coffee was not just
hot, but *dangerously* hot. The Association of Trial Lawyers of America
provides an excellent description of this case."
Note: descriptions of the woman's burns are quite graphic.
http://tinyurl.com/58ul
Sorry, that one is a pet peeve.
Joe K
===================
Alan MacHett wrote:
the good ol' U. S. of A.
only in Amerika can you spill hot coffee on your crotch and win $3M in a
lawsuit.
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
[internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
[internetworkers] Re:[rant] legal outrage,
Joe Komenda, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers][rant] ...now McD's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers][rant] ...now McD's, Ian Meyer, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers][rant] ...now McD's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
Shea Tisdale, 07/01/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, DonBartholf, 07/01/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's, DonBartholf, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] [rant] legal outrage, setback for rape vic's,
B, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Steven Champeon, 07/02/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...], Don Rua, 07/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Steven Champeon, 07/02/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Tanner Lovelace, 07/01/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Jurors [was: legal outrage...],
Alan MacHett, 07/01/2004
-
[internetworkers] Re:[rant] legal outrage,
Joe Komenda, 07/01/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.