internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: [internetworkers] digital video recorder, digital camera
- From: "Kurt Schlatzer" <kurt AT kurtschlatzer.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] digital video recorder, digital camera
- Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 08:42:37 -0400
Michael D. Thomas wrote:
> It's time to get a digital camera, maybe one that can take short
> movies.
> Or maybe it's time to get a digital camcorder, maybe one that is also
> good at taking standard snapshots.
If you want movies, get a movie camera. The built-in movie capability in
most digital cameras sucks and most limit you to either a set time like 45
seconds, or until you run out of space on your flash card, which happens
quickly when shooting movies.
As for cameras being cameras, I prefer Canon as a brand.
Go here for examples of what an older model Canon is capable of:
http://www.kurtschlatzer.com/portfolio
Kurt Schlatzer
Web Design & Development | Graphic Design | Photography
www.kurtschlatzer.com | 919.523.3032
-
[internetworkers] digital video recorder, digital camera,
Michael D. Thomas, 06/27/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] digital video recorder, digital camera,
Kurt Schlatzer, 06/28/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] digital video recorder, digital camera, Marcia, 06/28/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] digital video recorder, digital camera,
Ian Meyer, 06/28/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] digital video recorder, digital camera, Tom Caswell, 06/28/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] digital video recorder, digital camera,
Kurt Schlatzer, 06/28/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.