Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - Re: [internetworkers] are you 'strapped'?

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Phillip Rhodes <mindcrime AT cpphacker.co.uk>
  • To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [internetworkers] are you 'strapped'?
  • Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 20:08:29 -0400

Alan MacHett wrote:

Ah, but it's the UNconcealed firearm that really gets people's attention.

The only thing more "nutball" would be whistling your way down the
sidewalk, naked perhaps, while swinging your broadsword to and fro...

Sounds like the rhetoric of a card-carrying member of that Sarah Brady
led band of misguided freaks who call themselves Handgun Control Inc.

The truth is, there's absolutely nothing "nutty" about a law-abiding
citizen choosing to carry a legally owned firearm, concealed
or not. The "nuts" are the people who, for some weird reason,
seem to think the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution is somehow
less relevant / important / worthy / whatever, than the other
components of the Bill of Rights.


TTYL,

Phil

--
When the 1st Amendment no longer protects your voice.
And when the 4th Amendment no longer protects your privacy or your stuff.
Thank God we have the 2nd Amendment to tell our elected representatives that enough is enough.
It's time to put "... from my cold, dead hands" back where it belongs.

FREE AMERICA
Vote Libertarian
www.lp.org




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page