Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[uzoma nwosu <uzoma AT audioverse.com>]

Steven Champeon wrote:
> on Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 01:08:57AM -0500, Tom Boucher wrote:

> Did you read the article? Makes a certain sense to me - punk has always
> been distrustful of hippie liberals;

I don't know about that.  I've always thought that punk is distrustful 
of anyone being fake, hippie liberal or not.  Especially if you labeled 
yourself as punk.

 and AFAIK hasn't ever been a
> wellspring of deep thought or reflection beyond immature, reflexive
> anger. So, naturally, there are bound to be some Republicans in the mix
> somewhere. 

This depends on who talk to.  Punk is not about mohawks and getting 
angry.  A number of my buddies were into zen philosophy and peace (and 
health care and ...).  They just rocked hard. You're really pointing 
lame fake immature jerks that can be found everywhere with this variety 
 of Republican in there.

> and besides, Fugazi isn't punk, it's DC hardcore.)

Call it punk or DC hardcore or whatever.  It's good.  That's that.

Uzoma