internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
RE: [internetworkers] Re: Traffic Lawyer recommendation
- From: "Jim Ray" <jim AT neuse.net>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Re: Traffic Lawyer recommendation
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:58:47 -0400
no. me thinks the court system won't let you have too many improper
equipment thingies in too short a period of time, though.
improper equipment worked for me once upon a time in kanapolis nc.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Manning [mailto:jmm AT sublogic.com]
Sent: Tue 8/19/2003 3:35 PM
To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
Cc:
Subject: [internetworkers] Re: Traffic Lawyer recommendation
> Maybe the "improper equipment" thing could fly in SC where car
inspections
> are no longer required, but for some duration of your car's
yearly
> inspection your equipment "should" be "proper".
do they check your speedometer calibration during your
inspections?
- RE: [internetworkers] Re: Traffic Lawyer recommendation, Jim Ray, 08/19/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.