Homestead mailing list

[bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>]

My question ( and it was a question) originally was two-fold.  Was the DNA of 
identical twins, identical?  And, if what was being said was that we could 
change our genetics by will?  (not "at will" , by by will).  James's last 
reply to Marie, which you referenced, cleared up, for me, the direction he 
was taking.  I'm still not clear about the answers to my questions, 
though..............bobford

---------------------------------------------------------------------


--- On Sat, 11/29/08, roxann <roxann AT ancientearthwisdom.com> wrote:

> From: roxann <roxann AT ancientearthwisdom.com>
> Subject: Re: [Homestead] twin google was Re: Kuntsler , new commentary,     
>   super-inflation
> To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Date: Saturday, November 29, 2008, 7:45 AM
> I agree with James. There are lots of mechanisms that are
> unexplained because science hasn't figured it out yet,
> and may never. Just because it isn't explainable, or
> studied by science, or proven by scientists, doesn't
> mean it isn't possible. Some genes exist for no apparent
> reason, and some are either 'on' or 'off'
> and one day they might find a way to flip the switch
> whichever way they want. or they might find a reason for why
> certain genes exist or don't in the first place. Just
> because we can't imagine a way doesn't mean that
> someone else someday won't. And if we can imagine a way,
> just because it's considered mysticism and fancy now
> doesn't mean that someday it won't be considered
> science.
> 
> Roxann, NW AR
> http://blog.ancientearthwisdom.com (Ozark Musings from the
> homestead)
> -------------------------------------------------------
>  
>  >That is, unless
>  
>  > you think that people have conscious control over
> what happens to
>  > their genes and they are able to direct changes to
> them. If that's
>  > your theory, then we've left science and entered
> New Age mysticism.
>  
>  A very short time ago the notion that one's genetic
> makeup could alter at
>  all, the epigentics or the sequencing, was considered
> itself to be fanciful
>  mysticism.  Now it is not.  Every estabilshed
> scientific principle we consider to
>  be truth incarnate now of days was at one time leaving
> science and entering
>  mysticism.
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/bobford79%40yahoo.com
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead