Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - [Homestead] Election now over - what kind of reconciliation

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Homestead] Election now over - what kind of reconciliation
  • Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 14:11:23 -0800 (PST)

I just ran across this column from Vin Suprynowicz from Last Sunday. I was
very surprised at the worried tone of his reaction to the election's
conclusion. He is a brilliant Libertarian writer and thinker, I have read
his writings off and on for a long time. He obviously has some of the same
suspicions of Obama that some on this list expressed.

Suprynowicz is not the hysterical type, just the opposite, he is a very
rational man. Thus, this commentary really surprised me. If you are tired
of politics, you can just delete this, but because of previous similar
conversations on the list and because of Suprynowicz's sound reputation in
Libertarian circles, I thought this was interesting enough to post.

I don't necessarily agree or disagree with any or all parts of his
commentary. I am still trying to reason all of this material. Once again,
if you are tired of any political discussion, just delete this thread. If
someone who is interested can explain why a rational man with a sound
reputation sounds so concerned, I am interested ..........bobford


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is not a game -- we do not shake hands

VIN SUPRYNOWICZ

Having been raised a Democrat, I know how Democrats pride themselves on their
tolerance and sensitivity -- especially toward those with different views.

Among the messages of tolerance and sensitivity I received from Democrats
during the final days before the Nov. 4 election were the following:


-- "You go ahead and do that, Vin." (vote for McCain-Palin, presumably.) "The
rest of us pinkos will be busy running every branch of government and
redistributing your juicy assistant editor paycheck."

That's perhaps the one refreshing thing about this race. The socialists were
at least out of the closet, admitting precisely what they plan.

-- "Hey Vin, Look in the mirror if you want to see a real dirtbag. I can't
wait until tomorrow night when the 'communist sympathizer' kicks your ass --
and the ass of everyone who thinks like you. Welcome to the 21st century.
Asshole."

Numerous correspondents ridiculed my Nov. 2 reference to Barack Obama as a
"communist sympathizer." For details on Obama's associations with communist
poet Frank Marshall Davis, and with Weathermen bomber William Ayres, visit
www.vinsuprynowicz.com/?p=121 and scroll down about halfway -- or simply do
some Googling.

In addition to this, the closest thing to a "real job" Barack Obama ever had
was training people to become "community organizers," employing doctrines and
methods developed by the infamous Saul "The Red" Alinsky, who was not so
named because he had orange hair.

And the "father" mentioned in "Dreams from My Father" was Nairobi
collectivist Barack Hussein Obama Sr., who favored government seizure of the
farms of a racial minority (white people) and who enthusiastically wrote,
"There is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100 percent of
income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate
with their income which is taxed."

Frankly, despite his tax and socialized medicine schemes (he has told
supporters he needs to start slow; he can't get us to "single payer"
immediately), his extremist desire to ban and confiscate all non-police
handguns, and his surprisingly well-reported "spread the wealth around"
comments, I doubt Sen. Obama is a communist.

But there is no stable "mix" between property rights and forced
redistribution. The thieving class will always vote themselves more. Sen.
Obama's instincts, training, and associations will lead him to drive us
further in that direction.

In newspapering we only write what we can demonstrate, and I felt on far
safer ground simply observing there is little doubt Obama feels great
"sympathy" toward the political and economic doctrines of his father, of
Frank Marshall Davis, of William Ayres, and of Saul "The Red" Alinsky. He is
thus, demonstrably, "a communist sympathizer."

-- -- --

Sen. John McCain was gracious in defeat Tuesday night, urging his fellow
Americans to now unite in supporting Sen. Obama, chosen by the voters to be
"the next president of the country we both love."

In these remarks, Sen. McCain made clear why he lost the election. One is
tempted to say "why he and his party" lost the election. But unfortunately,
his concession remarks also revealed what some pundits have been saying for
months: John McCain has no party.

So far as Sen. McCain is concerned, he was pleased to submit his resume in
application for "The Big Job." He received a fair interview; the election
went to the better orator with the better turn-out-the-vote organization, and
thus he could in good conscience shake hands when the job went to someone
else: Better luck next time, old fellow.

Sen. McCain did not merely "do a poor job" articulating the philosophy of
expansive liberty and limited government. He failed to articulate it at all,
because he is not an adherent of this philosophy, and could thus play no role
in calling forth the forces of freedom to do battle on behalf of this
philosophy, as articulated down through the centuries by Jefferson, Bastiat,
Nock, von Mises, Hayek, R.A. Taft, Rand, Goldwater, Ron Paul, et al.

Those who suffered a year's worth of frustration waiting for John McCain to
sound that rallying cry are now criticized for acting "bitter" about the Nov.
4 results. We are expected to act like the losing team after a sporting
contest, lining up to shake hands with the victors.

The problem is, socialism is not a game played on a 60-minute clock within
the "out-of-bounds" markers, where you're free to come back and try again,
with the scoreboard set back to zero-zero, next season.

In the 20th century, socialism -- which comes in many forms, but always
involves the use of armed force or the threat of force to seize wealth from
the productive class and redistribute it to the less creative, the less
innovative, the less industrious -- murdered millions, and impoverished
hundreds of millions more.

The socialists never enter the next round with the scoreboard "reset to zero"
-- they consolidate the gains of 1912 and 1932 and 1964 and 2008, digest
their new powers and all the wealth they've confiscated from their victims,
and then -- swollen with all they have devoured -- ask, "Play again?"

For 100 years, our battles have almost all been holding actions and "fighting
retreats" before the expanding forces of government tyranny. But we're
supposed to smile, fund the opposition with our confiscated earnings, and be
good sports about it.

Since they can tantalize the ill-schooled masses with promises of "free
stuff, seized from the greedy rich," the socialists nearly always defeat us.
Even during our temporary "victories" -- the Reagan years, for instance --
the rhetoric may swing our way, but the power and grasp and size of the state
continue to grow. Yet that is not enough for them. Oh no. They proceed to get
quite irate if we fail to shake hands and join with them in celebrating their
latest victory over the outnumbered forces of freedom!

We're not "good sports" about it!

Socialists are thieves. They are worse than thieves, because they assume a
pose of high moral dudgeon if we call them what they are, proceeding to claim
the authorization of "majority support" for their crimes. They are in fact
slavers, insisting we not only pay up, but do so with a smile and a happy
little minstrel song.

They ridicule us, saying, 'What do you mean, 'socialism'? We already have
Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid. Are you calling those wonderful
programs 'socialism'?"

Of course I am. And the government schools -- the youth propaganda camps
where new little legions of socialists are bred -- those are socialist
programs, as well.

With Jefferson, we have pledged eternal enmity to these ongoing crimes
against human energy, ingenuity, and decency. This is not "a game." With
these forces of darkness, which will eventually ruin this once-proud nation,
casting us broken and bankrupt on the mercy of the enemies of freedom, we do
not shake hands.

We nearly always lose. But while we breathe, we fight.







  • [Homestead] Election now over - what kind of reconciliation, bob ford, 11/15/2008

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page