Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - [Homestead] burning hell on earth, never mind religion ...

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Toni Hawryluk" <tonihawr AT msn.com>
  • To: "Homestead mailing list" <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: [Homestead] burning hell on earth, never mind religion ...
  • Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 12:30:44 -0800

..no Kyoto accord for the U.S. though ....



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6433717/



Study: Arctic warming threatens people, wildlife

Eight-nation report faults fossil fuels; U.S. in wait-and-see mode

Subhankar Banerjee

Reuters contributed to this report.



Photo deleted for sending : A polar bear makes its way across a frozen
stretch of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska. A report released
Monday warns warmer Arctic temperatures could wipe out polar bears by 2100.



MSNBC staff and news service reports

Updated: 2:56 p.m. ET Nov. 8, 2004

OSLO, Norway - Global warming is heating the Arctic almost twice as fast as
the rest of the planet in a thaw that threatens the livelihoods of millions
of people and could wipe out polar bears by 2100, according to an
eight-nation report released on Monday.

The report, the work of more than 250 scientists and the biggest survey to
date of the Arctic climate, found that the accelerating melt could point to
wider disruptions from a build-up of human emissions of heat-trapping gases
in the earth's atmosphere.

The "Arctic climate is now warming rapidly and much larger changes are
projected," according to the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA), which
was commissioned by the Arctic Council and funded by the United States,
Canada, Russia, Denmark, Iceland, Sweden, Norway and Finland.

The report projects that temperatures in the Arctic will rise by 8 to 14
degrees Fahrenheit in the next 100 years. If temperatures then stayed stable,
the Greenland icecap would melt altogether in 1,000 years and raise global
sea levels by about 23 feet.

Possible benefits like more productive fisheries, easier access to oil and
gas deposits or trans-Arctic shipping routes would be outweighed by threats
to indigenous peoples and the habitats of animals and plants.

Sea ice around the North Pole, for instance, could almost disappear in summer
by the end of the century, it said. The extent of the ice has already shrunk
by 15-20 percent in the past 30 years.

"Polar bears are unlikely to survive as a species if there is an almost
complete loss of summer sea-ice cover," the report said. On land, creatures
like lemmings, caribou, reindeer or snowy owls are being forced north into a
narrower range.

Fossil fuels blamed
The report mainly blames the melt on gases from fossil fuels burned in cars,
factories and power plants. The Arctic warms faster than the global average
because dark ground and water, once exposed, traps more heat than reflective
snow and ice.

"Changes in the Arctic provide an early indication of the environmental and
societal significance of global warming," it said.

The thaw will have a global impact - melting of glaciers will raise global
sea levels by about 4 inches by the end of the century.

Many of the four million people in the Arctic are already affected. Buildings
from Russia to Canada have been demolished because of subsidence linked to
thawing permafrost that also destabilizes oil pipelines, roads and airports.

Indigenous hunters are falling through thinning ice and say that prey from
seals to whales is harder to find. Rising levels of ultra-violet radiation
may cause cancers.

Changes under way in the Arctic "present serious challenges to human health
and food security, and possibly even (to) the survival of some cultures," the
report says.

Even so, farming could benefit in some areas, while more productive forests
are moving north onto former tundra.

U.S. 'sidetrack' strategy?
Foreign ministers from Arctic nations are due to meet in Iceland on Nov. 24
but diplomats say they are deeply split, with Washington least willing to
make drastic action.

Some European partners have accused the Bush administration of trying to
weaken any policy recommendations that stem from the report.

President Bush has made clear he opposes mandatory curbs on gases like carbon
dioxide, which create a greenhouse effect on Earth. Many scientists fear
fossil fuel sources of CO2 and other gases are warming the Earth beyond the
natural greenhouse effect.

Bush also pulled out of the U.N.'s 1997 protocol on global warming, arguing
it was too expensive and exempted China, India and other rapidly developing
nations.

Most other industrial nations, most recently Russia, have agreed to Kyoto's
target of cutting developed nations' CO2 emissions by five percent below 1990
levels by 2008-12.

One European negotiator said the administration is trying to "sidetrack the
whole process so it is not confronted with the question, 'Do you believe in
climate change, or don't you?'"

A European diplomat added that "U.S. negotiators say 'we already have a
policy on global warming - we can't have a new one just for the Arctic'."

The negotiator added that while the other member nations will try to press
the United States on the matter in the final talks, "I cannot see any
solution to this unless (the Bush administration) clearly changes its
position."

Scientists agreed to discuss parts of the Arctic Council report ahead of full
publication. And some European governments originally wanted the report
issued before Tuesday's U.S. presidential election.

U.S. objection to wording
The Washington Post reported on Oct. 4 that the Bush administration has
lobbied to drop a policy section stating that in order to meet climate goals
set in 1992, the "Arctic Council urges the member states to individually and
when appropriate, jointly, adopt climate change strategies across relevant
sectors. These strategies should aim at the reduction of the emission of
greenhouse gases."

A senior State Department official who asked not to be identified told the
Post that "we're bound by the administration's position. We're not going to
make global climate policy at the Arctic Council."

The White House said Monday it would not comment on the scientific review and
would await a final report next year that includes input from diplomats.
"This is one draft of a report that has yet to be finished," White House
spokesman Trent Duffy said.

Environmental groups have urged the council to crack down.

"The big melt has begun," Jennifer Morgan, director of the World Wildlife
Fund's global climate change campaign, said in a statement. She said
industrialized nations were using the Arctic as a guinea pig in an
uncontrolled experiment on climate change.

What drives climate change?

Solar input
A third of the sun's energy is reflected back into space after hitting
Earth's upper atmosphere, but two thirds gets through, driving Earth's
weather engine.



The atmosphere
A delicate balance of gases gives Earth its livable temperature. Known as
"greenhouse" gases because they trap heat inside the atmosphere, they send a
portion of that heat back to Earth's surface. The gases include water vapor,
carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide.



The oceans
Covering two thirds of Earth, oceans are the key source of moisture in the
air and they store heat efficiently, transporting it thousands of miles. The
oceans and marine life also consume huge amounts of carbon dioxide.



The water cycle
Higher air temperatures can increase water evaporation and melting of ice.
And while water vapor is the most potent greenhouse gas, clouds also affect
evaporation, creating a cooling effect.



Clouds
They both cool Earth by reflecting solar energy and warm Earth by trapping
heat being radiated up from the surface.



Ice and snow
The whiteness of ice and snow reflects heat out, cooling the planet. When ice
melts into the sea, that drives heat from the ocean.



Land surfaces
Mountain ranges can block clouds, creating "dry" shadows downwind. Sloping
land allows more water runoff, leaving the land and air drier. A tropical
forest will soak up carbon dioxide, but once cleared for cattle ranching, the
same land becomes a source of methane, a greenhouse gas.



Human influences
Humans might be magnifying warming by adding to the greenhouse gases
naturally present in the atmosphere. Fuel use is the chief cause of rising
carbon dioxide levels. On the other hand, humans create temporary, localized
cooling effects through the use of aerosols, such as smoke and sulfates from
industry, which reflect sunlight away from Earth.



(The following is a link to an interactive slide show) :



The greenhouse
effect<javascript:OCW('http://www.msnbc.com/modules/greenhouse/default.asp','int520x550','width=520,height=550');>
How the Earth maintains a temperature conducive to life



Source: National Geographic; MSNBC

The Arctic report is online at http://amap.no/acia/<http://amap.no/acia/>.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page