Homestead mailing list

[Tvoivozhd <tvoivozd AT infionline.net>]

Don Bowen wrote:

>  <http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/1401/>http://www.inthesetimes.com/site/main/article/1401/ 
>
>
> The next time someone tells you to support the troops, tell them you 
> will when the administration does.
>
>
>
> Don Bowen
> Awl Knotted Up Woodworking
> Valley Center, CA             http://www.braingarage.com
tvoivozhd---I conducted a number of WWII courtmartials for criminals 
with a better record than Bush.  By WWII standards he would be serving 
twenty years at hard labor right now, instead of cynically running for 
President on non-existent military operational and planning competency.

The stupid SOB injured four more grunts four days ago, because he STILL 
puts them in unarmored Humvees.

The most harsh operational conditions for tanks, trucks and aircraft is 
to operate in a cloud of abrasive dust as ours doevery day  in Iraq.  
Bush does not support troops and vehicles with sufficient spare parts, 
does not support supply columns with accompanying armored vehicles or 
with accompanying overhead surveillance and attack aircraft.

The dirty bastard yesterday was an accomplice in murdering fifty new 
Iraqi graduates of a training course who left in an a TOTALLY UNARMED 
TRUCK CONVOY---AND WITHOUT SO MUCH AS A SINGLE FIREARM ON ANY OF THEM.  
Jesus Kitty Christ---from the time I got out of Officer Training, I 
carried at least one weapon (usually three), at all times on any 
military base, while travelling any road, and in any civilian or combat 
area.

Now that I think of it, twenty years at hard labor would not be a severe 
enough sentence for the BushBastard,.

>