grhits AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Global Reproductive Health IT Support list
List archive
- From: "Tor de Vries" <TDevries AT engenderhealth.org>
- To: "Global Reproductive Health IT Support list" <grhits AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [grhits] Web apps/site accesibility
- Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 10:40:33 -0400
Jojo...
I have some experience designing web pages for
low-bandwidth audiences, though honestly 256 kbps doesn't sound like low
bandwidth. Maybe 14.4 kbps -- that's low
bandwidth.
If your target audience has download access at 256 kbps,
and if my mental calculator is working properly, then they have a peak download
capacity of roughly 30kb (file size) per second. For optimal usability,
you would keep your page load to under 2 seconds, so we're talking 60kb of
data. If you reuse external CSS, images, and _javascript_ files across your
web pages, these will [almost certainly] be cached in your visitor's browser, so
you could put more data in those files. E.g. a web page's total data
footprint might be 100kb (HTML + CSS + images + scripting) but if 60kb are
external files shared across all the pages, then subsequent visits to the site
will only incur the 40kb non-cached portion (HTML) of the page.
Reusability is a good idea, anyway, but it also offers speed
benefits.
(Totally aside: I can't remember if kilobit is "kb" and
kilobyte is "Kb" or "KB" or "kB".......)
Anyway, if you use Firefox, and you are a web developer, I
recommend the Firebug extension (http://www.getfirebug.com/) for debugging
web sites. Yahoo's developer team recently released YSlow (http://developer.yahoo.com/yslow/)
which is a free Firebug plug-in that analyzes the speed and cacheability of your
web pages (though I would take their advice on acceleration with a large grain
of salt). However, installing Firebug and YSlow may slightly reduce the
speed of your web browser (since it captures and analyzes the web page as it
loads).
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Tor From: grhits-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:grhits-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Jojo Almario Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 4:27 PM To: grhits AT lists.ibiblio.org Subject: [grhits] Web apps/site accesibility This questions is for the web app/page developers and/or
designers out there who have experience designing apps/sites accessible by third
world countries. I realize they may be much more to consider than what I am
about to list but I need to start somewhere. Anywhere here is the
question…. Considering the use of CSS, regular graphics, text, floating
or background graphics, what would the optimum size be for each. To put
this another way what size limit would make the those resources, easily
accessible? Just accessible? Barely accessible? Lets also say that our
target audience are workers in Kenya most of whom have a connection roughly
averaging 256kdown/128up. I know this question may be very unclear and depend on a lot
of factors, but I may also need to hear some of those “depends on..” type
answers as they will help me go in the direction I need to go. Feel free to ask for more clarification, Jojo Almario Intrahealth International
inc. |
-
[grhits] Web apps/site accesibility,
Jojo Almario, 08/01/2007
- Re: [grhits] Web apps/site accesibility, Tor de Vries, 08/14/2007
-
[grhits] SRH webmasters question,
Tor de Vries, 08/14/2007
-
Re: [grhits] SRH webmasters question,
Jojo Almario, 08/14/2007
- Re: [grhits] SRH webmasters question, Tor de Vries, 08/14/2007
-
Re: [grhits] SRH webmasters question,
Jojo Almario, 08/14/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.