Kata Markon

[Emmanuel Fritsch <emmanuel.fritsch AT ensg.ign.fr>]

J. Ted Blakley a écrit:

> Sorry about the previous truncated message. I accidentally sent it 
> while I was composing. Here is the completed message.
>
> Kenneth,
>     I am not familiar with this theory of the editing of Mark at the
> hand of Luke, and I get the impression from your post that there are
> probably a number of features of Mark, besides those you cite, that
> are used in support of the theory. So my comments below would likely
> not challenge the theory but only some of the evidence used in
> support. [..] 


According Boismard ("L'Evangile de Marc, sa préhistoire", Gabalda, 
1994), there are many evidences of a Lukan editing of Mark.As I say just 
before, the use of EGENETO in Mark should be Lukan.

Other elements :
- sometime, Mark use KAI, and on other places, KAI and DE are mixed. 
This heterogeneity would be due to the edition.
- Gerasene Demoniac is seen as a composed story, based on a Markan 
Capernaum-like exorcism, (mainly v. 1-8) which has been completed in a 
lukan style.
- final Mark is full of Lukan style vocabulary.
- duality in Mark : in many places, duality is due to the addition of 
Lukan elements into a Mark and Mathew tradition. As an example : Mk 
1:4-5, with "preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of 
sins" sounding particularly Lukan.

If you are interested, just ask.

a+
 manu