freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77 AT gmail.com>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] a better libtds
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:25:39 +0200
News? I have a CVS repository mirror and I'm able to do a conversion.
The only option I would discuss is -A option to cvsimport (I used it
with success). CVS repository use unix usernames for user while git
use e-mail. -A option allow you to specify unix username -> e-mail
conversion, currently I have
$ cat ~/cpp/freetds/cvs_author
freddy77=Frediano Ziglio <freddy77 AT gmail.com>
jklowden=JK Lowden <jklowden AT freetds.org>
my repository is currently at https://gitorious.org/freetds but I
would prefer GitHub too for official repository (more stable and more
features).
Do we have already a GitHub account? If you like I can convert again
entire project and branches and push to a new GitHub project.
Regards
Frediano
2011/8/23 Brian Bruns <brian AT bruns.com>:
> Been using github for a coupla years, rock solid and the pull requests
> will make a maintainers life quite easy. There was a big learning
> curve with git itself, but that's another story.
>
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:45 PM, James K. Lowden <jklowden AT freetds.org>
> wrote:
>
>>> this big work would go much easier if we were all
>>> on git. Anybody ready to make that a reality?
>>
>> I'm ready. It might be a little while before automatic patching and
>> nightly snapshots are available. If there's a real emergency, we can
>> still use CVS for patches to 0.91, otherwise even a month's delay of
>> snapshots right after a release won't cause anyone great pain,
>> especially because we're disturbing the code quite a bit.
>>
>> Have we agreed on a git hub?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --jkl
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
>
-
[freetds] a better libtds,
jklowden, 08/18/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
Dann Corbit, 08/18/2011
- Re: [freetds] a better libtds, James K. Lowden, 08/22/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
Brian Bruns, 08/18/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
James K. Lowden, 08/22/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
Brian Bruns, 08/22/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
James K. Lowden, 08/22/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
Brian Bruns, 08/22/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
James K. Lowden, 08/22/2011
- Re: [freetds] a better libtds, Brian Bruns, 08/22/2011
- Re: [freetds] a better libtds, Frediano Ziglio, 08/25/2011
- [freetds] git transition (Re: a better libtds), Craig A. Berry, 08/26/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
James K. Lowden, 08/22/2011
- Re: [freetds] a better libtds, Neuhauser, Roman (GE Capital, consultant), 08/23/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
Brian Bruns, 08/22/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
James K. Lowden, 08/22/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
Brian Bruns, 08/22/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
James K. Lowden, 08/22/2011
-
Re: [freetds] a better libtds,
Dann Corbit, 08/18/2011
- Re: [freetds] a better libtds, James K. Lowden, 08/22/2011
- Re: [freetds] a better libtds, James K. Lowden, 08/22/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.