freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Frediano Ziglio <freddy77 AT gmail.com>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows
- Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:27:44 +0100
Il giorno lun, 11/01/2010 alle 10.21 -0500, jklowden AT schemamania.org ha
scritto:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 02:27:53PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 2010/1/9 James K. Lowden <jklowden AT freetds.org>:
> > > tdserror() assumes errnum can be converted to a string with strerror(3).
> > > On Windows that's not true; for winsock errors strerror(3) returns
> > > "Unknown error". ?Somehow, we need to pass the Win32 error string
> > > (returned from tds_prwsaerror()) to the client libraries. ?But how?
> >
> > The problem is that in Windows C errors (from errno) and system errors
> > (from GetLastError/WSAGetLastError or returned from APIs depending on
> > API set!)
>
> Yes.
>
> > > My suggestion: add
> > >
> > > ? ? ? ?char * winsock_errstr
> >
> > I don't like this... perhaps would be better to understand if is a
> > socket error from tds error code.
>
> OK. winsock_errstr is a flag, too. If set, it's a winsock error, or other
> error for which strerror(3) is no help.
>
> Maybe we should just call it "errstr". It would be set whenever strerror()
> is no use. dbperror() would say something like:
>
> fprintf( "...%s...", tds->errstr? tds->errstr : strerror() )
>
> > Looking at windows constants I would use a trick and an unique error
> > number. C errors in windows are very few (the higher constant is 80
> > but is not used by FreeTDS) while socket errors are usually higher
> > than 10000.
>
> The advantage to your idea is that function that provoked the error doesn't
> need to do anything to tell the error-printing logic which API created the
> error. And it's threadsafe. It's also fragile, and unobvious to anyone
> reading the code.
>
> Instead of depending on the values, we could see if strerror(3) succeeds in
> dbperror():
>
> errno_copy = errno;
> errno = 0;
> msg = strerror(errno_copy);
> if( errno != 0 )
> msg = tds_prwsaerror();
> fprintf( "...", msg );
>
>
> (I don't know if Microsoft's strerror(3) reliably sets errno if it fails.)
>
It's also true that oserr is used only by dblib and passed to client
application on error handler... Perhaps would be better to translate C
errors into Windows system errors and use FormatMessage for windows and
strerror for Unix?
> > Perhaps we could define a tds_strerror that take this
> > constants and output a string. (see
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/t3ayayh1%28VS.80%29.aspx and
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms740668%28VS.85%29.aspx).
>
> Cf. net.c::tds_prwsaerror().
>
> Win32 strerror(3) uses _sys_errlist and _sys_nerr. If strerror(3) doesn't
> work (i.e. winsock) then _sys_errlist and _sys_nerr won't work either.
>
> > Another problem is thread safety. strerror is not thread safe, it
> > would be better to use strerror_r if available. Under Windows for C
> > errors there is _sys_nerrs and _sys_errlist.
>
> Not exactly:
>
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/functions/strerror.html
>
> "The strerror() function need not be reentrant."
>
> Need not be, but may be. I think Win32 strerror(3) is threadsafe.
>
> I don't have the source code for Microsoft's strerror(3), but the header
> files define errno, _sys_nerrs, and _sys_errlist as macros that call
> functions that *should* return thread-local values.
>
Yes, but can be not thread-safe on some Unix... we always use strerror,
windows or not.
> > Good! I saw you committed patch for defncopy and Windows
>
> Oops! I didn't mean to commit it. It's a bit of a mess. It was just a
> quick hack so I could use it. But it's much better now, thanks!
>
I just did some cleanup after compiler told me that some functions was
unused...
> > I saw some strange include in defncopy like
> > replacements.win32.hacked.h, win32.microsoft directory.
>
> The idea is to let it compile with FreeTDS or Microsoft's library. If we
> want to support that generally, we need a way to supplement Microsoft's
> libc e.g. getopt(3).
>
Catched... but I think that currently does not work.
> > Also there is
> > a strange types.h inclusion in src/tds/token.c... quite strange,
> > tds_get_varint_size should be defined in data.c (which include
> > types.h), this breaks my cross Windows compile.
>
> On my system I have E:\freetds\build\src\tds\types.h generated by types.pl
> except for Win32/64. I also have include/x64/types.h (which is used in the
> win32 build, too) that is based types.pl,v 1.1 2008/09/17 12:16:09, which
> included:
>
> /**
> * tds_get_varint_size() returns the size of a variable length integer
> * returned in a TDS 7.0 result string
> */
> #if !ENABLE_EXTRA_CHECKS
> static
> #endif
> int
> tds_get_varint_size(TDSSOCKET * tds, int datatype)
>
> I see now ENABLE_EXTRA_CHECKS is not part of the current types.h.
>
> What file provides tds_get_varint_size in your Win32 build? (Let me guess.
> You build Win32 from the tarball, which includes types.h. I'm building
> from CVS, so I *should* run Perl myself to generate it. OK. More work for
> Nmakefile.)
>
In recent version there is no static in types.h so data.c "export"
tds_get_varint_size. I think you should update. I think that a developer
have to use perl even on windows or manually copy file from distribution
while users will use distribution which came with proper file.
Why not adding .sln/.vcproj and Nmakefile to distribution ??
> > Also I got a double
> > definition cause you added a strncasecmp in include/replacements.h.
> > Perhaps should be placed in defncopy.c (like strcasecmp define?).
>
> When you build Win32 as cross-compile, strncasecmp(3) is a function
> provided by the libc? <Maybe we need a way to distinguish between using
> Microsoft's C runtime and others. Do you know of a symbol defined only by
> Microsoft's header files, so we could do:
>
> #if USING_MICROSOFTS_H_FILES
> # define strncasecmp(x,y,z) stricmp((x),(y),(z))
> #endif
>
It's that macro is defined in replacements.h and tds_sysdep_private.h so
I got a warning about redefinition. I build defncopy as cross compile
using FreeTDS library (not MS one). Yes, MingW define str(n)casecmp in
string.h so I have no problem, probably is better to not define
str(n)casecmp if MingW is detected I think mostly windows compilers do
not define these functions. It seems also that Visual Studio 2005 give
warning suggesting the use of _stricmp instead of stricmp.
Perhaps defncopy.c should include tds_sysdep_private instead ?? This
define also strdup and other macro very useful.
> > Did you see my initial patch for forbid instance and port
> > specification on freetds.conf?? I attach it.
>
> I don't completely understand it, but please commit it and we'll try it
> out.
>
Committed.
> --jkl
>
freddy77
-
Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows
, (continued)
-
Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows,
James K. Lowden, 01/09/2010
-
Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows,
James K. Lowden, 01/09/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, Frediano Ziglio, 01/10/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, Andrew H. Wakefield, 01/10/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, James K. Lowden, 01/11/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, Andrew H. Wakefield, 01/13/2010
-
Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows,
James K. Lowden, 01/09/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, jklowden, 01/11/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, Christos Zoulas, 01/11/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, James K. Lowden, 01/11/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, Christos Zoulas, 01/11/2010
-
Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows,
James K. Lowden, 01/09/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, Frediano Ziglio, 01/11/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, James K. Lowden, 01/11/2010
- Re: [freetds] Using freetds in Windows, Frediano Ziglio, 01/12/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.