freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?
- From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden AT freetds.org>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 17:52:02 -0400
Reid, Roger L. wrote:
>
> I modified include/cspublic.h so that sqsh-2.1.5 would compile with
> 0.82. In March,
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/freetds/2008q1/023098.html dealt with
> about the same issue (except not including Sybase 15) by putting the
> defines in the sqsh code instead.
>
> I have only tested this on Solaris 8.
>
> ----------- diff -e cspublic.h.orig cspublic.h -----------------
> 449c
> #define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100
> #define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100
> #define BLK_VERSION_120 BLK_VERSION_100
> #define BLK_VERSION_125 CS_VERSION_125
> #define BLK_VERSION_150 CS_VERSION_150
Harrumph! I applied a patch from Richard Brown to the 0.82 branch in CVS
on 19 May 2008. I don't know why I didn't apply it to HEAD, too. Sorry
about that, Chief.
I applied the same patch to CVS HEAD just now. At least we can put that
issue to bed.
Thanks for the tickle.
--jkl
-
[freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?,
Reid, Roger L., 05/30/2008
- Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?, Dan Wierenga, 05/30/2008
- Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?, James K. Lowden, 05/30/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.