freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?
- From: "Dan Wierenga" <dwierenga AT valueclick.com>
- To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:46:45 -0700
> -----Original Message-----
> From: freetds-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:freetds-
> bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Reid, Roger L.
>
> This is one of those "not sure it belongs here" patches. I think it
> does, but I'm not unanimous in that.
>
> I modified include/cspublic.h so that sqsh-2.1.5 would compile with
> 0.82. In March,
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/freetds/2008q1/023098.html dealt
> with about the same issue
> (except not including Sybase 15) by putting the defines in the sqsh
> code instead.
FWIW, I think yours is the right fix. I wrote about the same issue when
installing DBD::Sybase.
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/freetds/2008q2/023298.html
It seems odd to patch sqsh and DBD::Sybase instead of FreeTDS.
-Dan
-
[freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?,
Reid, Roger L., 05/30/2008
- Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?, Dan Wierenga, 05/30/2008
- Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?, James K. Lowden, 05/30/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.