freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
[freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?
- From: "Reid, Roger L." <roger.reid AT dpw.com>
- To: <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 17:25:53 -0400
This is one of those "not sure it belongs here" patches. I think it does,
but I'm not unanimous in that.
I know when linking with Sybase's ct, I'll be getting them from Sybase's
includes.
I modified include/cspublic.h so that sqsh-2.1.5 would compile with 0.82.
In March, https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/freetds/2008q1/023098.html
dealt with about the same issue
(except not including Sybase 15) by putting the defines in the sqsh code
instead.
I have only tested this on Solaris 8.
----------- diff -e cspublic.h.orig cspublic.h -----------------
449c
#define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100
#define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100
#define BLK_VERSION_120 BLK_VERSION_100
#define BLK_VERSION_125 CS_VERSION_125
#define BLK_VERSION_150 CS_VERSION_150
.
----------- diff cspublic.h.orig cspublic.h -----------------
449c449,453
< #define BLK_VERSION_110 CS_VERSION_100
---
> #define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100
> #define BLK_VERSION_110 BLK_VERSION_100
> #define BLK_VERSION_120 BLK_VERSION_100
> #define BLK_VERSION_125 CS_VERSION_125
> #define BLK_VERSION_150 CS_VERSION_150
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Roger Reid (advocate of Nonfunctional Programming)
-
[freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?,
Reid, Roger L., 05/30/2008
- Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?, Dan Wierenga, 05/30/2008
- Re: [freetds] cspublic.h BLK_VERSION_XXX - should this patch be applied?, James K. Lowden, 05/30/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.