FreeTDS Development Group

[Sebastien FLAESCH <sf AT 4js.com>]

We have Windows 64b (with VC++ 8 of course) and Linux 64b machines here...

Send us a test program and we'll check if you want.

Seb

ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> > On Jan 18, 10:22am, sf AT 4js.com (Sebastien FLAESCH) wrote:
> > -- Subject: Re: [freetds] ODBC on 64 bit linux fix.
> >
> > | Thank you Steve,
> > | 
> > | Here is what we have tested:
> > | 
> > | CFLAGS="-D BUILD_REAL_64_BIT_MODE" ./configure 
> > --prefix=/opt3/dbs/tds/0.83 --with-odbc-nodm=/opt3/dbs/uxo/3.0
> > | 
> > | But when compiling, we get:
> > | 
> > | odbc.c:794: conflicting types for `SQLParamOptions'
> > | /dbs/64bits/uxo/3.0/include/sqlext.h:1893: previous 
> > declaration of `SQLParamOptions'
> > | 
> > | Am I missing something or is this what Christos tried to fix?
> > | 
> > | The headers comme from UnixODBC 2.2.12 ...
> > | 
> > | Cheers,
> > | Seb
> >
> > Yes, this is what I fixed.
> >
> > christos
>
> See http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B298678&x=14&y=7
>
> Also from our configure.ac
>
>                 # check is SQLParamOptions accept SQLULEN
>                 AC_TRY_COMPILE([#if defined(_WIN32) || defined(WIN32) ||
> defined(__MINGW32__)
> #include <windows.h>
> #endif
> #include <sql.h>
> #include <sqlext.h>
>
> SQLRETURN SQL_API SQLParamOptions(SQLHSTMT       hstmt,
>         SQLULEN crow, SQLULEN *pirow) {
>         return SQL_SUCCESS;
> }], [return 0],
>                 AC_DEFINE(TDS_SQLPARAMOPTIONS_SQLLEN, 1, [Define to 1 if
> SQLParamOptions accept SQLULEN as arguments]))
>         )
>
> but in odbc.c
>
> SQLRETURN ODBC_API
> SQLParamOptions(SQLHSTMT hstmt, SQLULEN crow, SQLULEN FAR * pirow)
> {
>         SQLRETURN res;
>
> This is a problem in MS specifications... pirow should correspond to
> SQL_ATTR_PARAMS_PROCESSED_PTR which is not 64-bit according which above
> link. Also SQL_ATTR_PARAMS_PROCESSED_PTR (see SQLSetStmtAttr
> documentation) maps to IPD SQL_DESC_ROWS_PROCESSED_PTR which is not
> documented as 64-bit. However SQL_ATTR_ROWS_FETCHED_PTR which correspond
> to IRD SQL_DESC_ROWS_PROCESSED_PTR is documented as 64-bit. So is
> SQL_DESC_ROWS_PROCESSED_PTR 32 or 64 bit?? Is it 64-bit only for IRD??
> Does pirow maps really to SQL_ATTR_PARAMS_PROCESSED_PTR that maps on IPD
> SQL_DESC_ROWS_PROCESSED_PTR?
>
> Someone have a 64-bit windows machine to execute some test?? I can pass
> some source test in order to test all that stuff... just to know how MS
> implemented its specifications... Is MingW available for 64-bit??
>
> freddy77
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds