FreeTDS Development Group

[Steve Langasek <vorlon AT dodds.net>]

On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:53:01AM +0100, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:33:05PM +0100, ZIGLIO, Frediano, 
> > VF-IT wrote:
> > > test64 tests (currently) SQL_DESC_ROWS_PROCESSED_PTR. This 
> > pointer holds
> > > the pointer to how many rows are returned/processed. I 
> > wrote test cause
> > > this pointer is bound to many attributes. The test demonstrate that
> > > indipendently from how you set this pointer it's always 
> > SQLULEN (that is
> > > 64bit on 64bit platforms). So
> > > - SQLSetStmtAttr SQL_ATTR_PARAMS_PROCESSED_PTR
> > > - SQLSetDescField SQL_DESC_ROWS_PROCESSED_PTR (both IPD and IRD)
> > > - SQLSetStmtAttr SQL_ATTR_PARAMS_PROCESSED_PTR
> > > - parameter pirow of SQLParamOptions
> > > - parameter RowCountPtr of SQLExtendedFetch
> > > are SQLULEN* under 64bit!
> > 
> > > This is not well stated at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/298678 !!
> > > For this reason SQLROWSETSIZE unixODBC type should be SQLULEN not
> > > SQLUINTEGER !!
> > 
> > Which they are with unixODBC 2.2.11; are you saying that the 
> > typedef of
> > SQLROWSETSIZE has regressed, or are you using an older version?

> I don't know, on Fedora Core 6 (I think results on Debian/Ubuntu should
> be different)

Ok, but what version of UnixODBC is included in FC6?

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek AT ubuntu.com                                     vorlon AT debian.org