FreeTDS Development Group

["ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>]

> From: Alex Kiesel
> 
> On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:06 +0100, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> > > > Are you sure ??
> > > > >From spec file it seems that script installed .la file 
> before 0.60
> > > > 
> > > > >From freetds.spec:
> > > > 
> > > > * Sun Dec 30 2002 David Hollis <dhollis AT davehollis.com>
> > > > - 0.60 tweaked.  Move .a & .la files to -devel package
> > > 
> > > Yes, the files are installed. Configure line is:
> > > ./configure --with-tdsver=5.0 --prefix=/tmp/freetds-0.63r5
> > > i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1
> > > 
> > > The list of installed files is attached - both .a and .la 
> files are
> > > installed.
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes, but the fact that freetds.spec contains indication for 
> these files
> > since 0.53 means that from 0.53 .la files should be installed.
> 
> I've just looked at freetds.spec.in, and think we're talking about two
> different things. the spec-file controls what's packed into 
> the rpm, if
> I guess right. I'm talking about `make install` installing .la and .a
> files.
> 

No, files are packaged from "make install" so that means that should be
present before 0.60.

freddy77