Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - RE: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
  • To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5
  • Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 08:38:04 +0100

> From: Alex Kiesel
>
> On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:06 +0100, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> > > > Are you sure ??
> > > > >From spec file it seems that script installed .la file
> before 0.60
> > > >
> > > > >From freetds.spec:
> > > >
> > > > * Sun Dec 30 2002 David Hollis <dhollis AT davehollis.com>
> > > > - 0.60 tweaked. Move .a & .la files to -devel package
> > >
> > > Yes, the files are installed. Configure line is:
> > > ./configure --with-tdsver=5.0 --prefix=/tmp/freetds-0.63r5
> > > i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1
> > >
> > > The list of installed files is attached - both .a and .la
> files are
> > > installed.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, but the fact that freetds.spec contains indication for
> these files
> > since 0.53 means that from 0.53 .la files should be installed.
>
> I've just looked at freetds.spec.in, and think we're talking about two
> different things. the spec-file controls what's packed into
> the rpm, if
> I guess right. I'm talking about `make install` installing .la and .a
> files.
>

No, files are packaged from "make install" so that means that should be
present before 0.60.

freddy77




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page