freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Alex Kiesel <alex.kiesel AT document-root.de>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5
- Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 00:22:19 +0100
On Mon, 2004-12-13 at 12:06 +0100, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> > > Are you sure ??
> > > >From spec file it seems that script installed .la file before 0.60
> > >
> > > >From freetds.spec:
> > >
> > > * Sun Dec 30 2002 David Hollis <dhollis AT davehollis.com>
> > > - 0.60 tweaked. Move .a & .la files to -devel package
> >
> > Yes, the files are installed. Configure line is:
> > ./configure --with-tdsver=5.0 --prefix=/tmp/freetds-0.63r5
> > i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1
> >
> > The list of installed files is attached - both .a and .la files are
> > installed.
> >
>
> Yes, but the fact that freetds.spec contains indication for these files
> since 0.53 means that from 0.53 .la files should be installed.
I've just looked at freetds.spec.in, and think we're talking about two
different things. the spec-file controls what's packed into the rpm, if
I guess right. I'm talking about `make install` installing .la and .a
files.
-Alex
-
[freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5,
Lowden, James K, 12/09/2004
-
Re: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5,
Alex Kiesel, 12/12/2004
-
Re: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/12/2004
- Re: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5, Alex Kiesel, 12/13/2004
-
Re: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/12/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 12/13/2004
- RE: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5, Alex Kiesel, 12/14/2004
- RE: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 12/15/2004
-
Re: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5,
Alex Kiesel, 12/12/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.