Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - RE: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
  • To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [freetds] 0.63 Release Candidate 5
  • Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:06:07 +0100

>
> On Sun, 2004-12-12 at 21:50 +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > Il dom, 2004-12-12 alle 17:31, Alex Kiesel ha scritto:
> > > On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 14:25 -0500, Lowden, James K wrote:
> > > > But if you haven't built a release candidate lately,
> please do so at
> > > > your earliest convenience. We want to make everyone happy. Any
> > > > reported problems are guaranteed to get our full
> attention, or your
> > > > money back.
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > this RC builds and installs fine and I have also prepared
> the FreeBSD
> > > port to be updated as soon as the final release is out.
> > >
> > > One thing that differs from previous releases is that
> libtool archives
> > > (.la) are installed now. Is this intentional?
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> >
> > Are you sure ??
> > >From spec file it seems that script installed .la file before 0.60
> >
> > >From freetds.spec:
> >
> > * Sun Dec 30 2002 David Hollis <dhollis AT davehollis.com>
> > - 0.60 tweaked. Move .a & .la files to -devel package
>
> Yes, the files are installed. Configure line is:
> ./configure --with-tdsver=5.0 --prefix=/tmp/freetds-0.63r5
> i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1
>
> The list of installed files is attached - both .a and .la files are
> installed.
>

Yes, but the fact that freetds.spec contains indication for these files
since 0.53 means that from 0.53 .la files should be installed.

bye
freddy77




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page