freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Re: [freetds] dblib and thread safety

From: liam AT inodes.org
To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [freetds] dblib and thread safety
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:58:59 +1000

On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 04:57:53PM +0200, Michael Peppler wrote:

> There's probably a reason why Sybase never attempted to make DBlibrary
> thread-safe...

Hmm, interesting.. Is the Microsoft win32 implementation thread-safe?

I've seen it used in multi-threaded applications before though that
doesn't mean it's thread safe! :)

Cheers.

[freetds] dblib and thread safety, liam, 09/14/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 09/14/2004
  - Re: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, liam, 09/15/2004
- RE: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 09/20/2004
  - Re: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, liam, 09/21/2004
    - Re: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, liam, 09/22/2004
- RE: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 09/21/2004
- RE: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 09/22/2004
  - Re: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, liam, 09/22/2004
    - Re: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, Michael Peppler, 09/22/2004
      - Re: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, liam, 09/22/2004
- RE: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, Lowden, James K, 09/22/2004
- RE: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 09/24/2004
- RE: [freetds] dblib and thread safety, Lowden, James K, 09/24/2004