freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Lowden, James K" <LowdenJK AT bernstein.com>
- To: 'FreeTDS Development Group' <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4
- Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:43:11 -0500
> From: Castellano, Nicholas
> Sent: January 8, 2004 11:57 AM
> > From: Lowden, James K
> > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 11:15 AM
> >
> > If Frediano says the tests are bogus, then, sure, let's
> > remove them from the release. Otherwise, I'm inclined to
> > leave them in with a note that they'll fail on some Solaris
> > machines for reasons that we don't understand. If we explain
> > what they test, the user will be able to determine whether or
> > not it's relevant. If it is, perhaps another interested
> > party will help us triangulate what's going on.
>
> Just to be clear: the failures are not restricted to
> Solaris; I reproduced
> the problem on Digital UNIX. On my DU4.0G system, the tests succeeded
> against a Sybase dataserver with TDS 5.0 and failed against a
> SQL2000 server with TDS 7.0.
Ah, and to answer Freiano's question, no, I didn't test ODBC on
NetBSD/Alpha. So it appears we're 0/2 with one abstention.
Is it correct to say that these ODBC unit tests fail on some (all?) 64-bit
platforms? Only with Microsoft servers? I wouldn't be ashamed to admit
that for 0.62.
--jkl
-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any
review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact
the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original
message. Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or instructions
by e-mail, and therefore will not be responsible for carrying out such orders
and/or instructions.
-
RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4
, (continued)
- RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4, Marquess, Dustin, 01/07/2004
- RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4, Castellano, Nicholas, 01/07/2004
- RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4, Lowden, James K, 01/07/2004
-
RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4,
Castellano, Nicholas, 01/07/2004
-
RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4,
Frediano Ziglio, 01/07/2004
- Re: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4, James K. Lowden, 01/07/2004
-
RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4,
Frediano Ziglio, 01/07/2004
- RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4, Lowden, James K, 01/07/2004
- RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4, Castellano, Nicholas, 01/08/2004
- RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4, Lowden, James K, 01/08/2004
- RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4, Castellano, Nicholas, 01/08/2004
- RE: [freetds] Status 0.62rc4, Lowden, James K, 01/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.