freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "David Fraser" <david AT abelon.com>
- To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:31:36 +0100
Way-hay!
Thanks Freddy and Bill. Got it sorted in the end.
It was environmental, and that odbcinst.ini file helped
Freddy.
Thanks again,
David
----- Original Message -----
From: "ZIGLIO Frediano" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 4:02 PM
Subject: RE: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?
>
> Hi Freddy...
>
> Thanks for responding...
>
> >You are using TDS 4.2. Try with an higher TDS version. Usually I try
> >with unixODBC. Current results (TDS5+, unixODBC) should be
> > - with GNU iconv + single-byte
>
> Ok - point number one I was using the wrong TDS version - but
> this doesn't affect what I see with the ODBC unit-tests.
>
> Still 6 failures as before with unixODBC.
> (As for iconv - I'm not using GNU, just what comes with FreeTDS:
>
> - connect - succeeds with several connection strings, but fails on the
> old version, due to my inability to configure
> odbcinst.ini properly.
> Doesn't affect ability of other tests to connect. So
> probably not an
> issue.
Documentation problem...
my /etc/odbcinst.ini
[PostgreSQL]
Description = ODBC for PostgreSQL
Driver = /usr/lib/libodbcpsql.so
Setup = /usr/lib/libodbcpsqlS.so
FileUsage = 1
[ODBC]
Trace = Yes
TraceFile = /tmp/sql.log
ForceTrace = No
Pooling = No
[FreeTDS]
Description = FreeTDS driver
Driver =
/home/fziglio/cpp/freetds/freetds/src/odbc/.libs/libtdsodbc.so
Setup =
/home/fziglio/cpp/freetds/freetds/src/odbc/.libs/libtdsodbc.so
FileUsage = 1
CPTimeout =
CPReuse =
> - funccall - don't know what's wrong here. Output parameters?
> - moreandcount - odd. Returned 0 columns instead of 1.
> - params - Don't know. Does output parameter support work?
Mmm.. try using --enable-developing in configure. Developing code will
be enabled in 0.62
> - transaction - Don't know why commit failed.
Know. I don't still know if this is a bug or just a different and
correct implementation.
> - type - Well this is quite possibly down to iconv
>
Related to ODBC3 updates. ODBC3 handle type in a weird way...
> I see that the last 3 are failures you listed. So the main
> mystery is over funccall and moreandcount - I guess. Any ideas?
>
> I've attached the output from make check, in case you
> or anyone else can be bothered.
>
> Cheers,
>
> David
>
>
I think your problems are related to --enable-developing and
odbcinst.ini...
freddy77
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
-
[freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?,
David Fraser, 10/22/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?,
Thompson, Bill D (London), 10/22/2003
- Re: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?, David Fraser, 10/22/2003
-
RE: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?,
ZIGLIO Frediano, 10/22/2003
- Re: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?, David Fraser, 10/22/2003
-
RE: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?,
ZIGLIO Frediano, 10/22/2003
- Re: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?, David Fraser, 10/22/2003
- Re: [freetds] Are unittests expected to fail?, David Fraser, 10/23/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.