freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon AT netexpress.net>
- To: freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question
- Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:51:29 -0600
Dave,
On Thu, Jan 30, 2003 at 02:32:20PM -0500, Coleman, Dave wrote:
> Does the TDS specification include any mechanism for providing packet
> redundancy? Obviously, the UDP protocol will not provide this.
> With regards to the fact that TDS uses UDP:
> * If I am utilizing only the tds layer of code, is there any
> protection for corrupted/dropped network packets?
> * Is it possible to use a TCP socket for this?
> * Does the TDS protocol support the use of TCP?
Color me confused -- what version of FreeTDS did you say you're using,
which uses a udp transport? Every MS SQL server I've worked with uses
tcp, at least; and I can't imagine Sybase would be any different in this
regard.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpr_RHikpFap.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
[freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question,
Coleman, Dave, 01/30/2003
- Re: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question, Steve Langasek, 01/30/2003
- Re: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question, Frediano Ziglio, 01/30/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question, Castellano, Nicholas, 01/30/2003
-
RE: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question,
Coleman, Dave, 01/31/2003
- [freetds] Supported date time formats, Shawn Greene, 01/31/2003
-
Re: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question,
Craig Davison, 01/31/2003
- Re: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question, Brian Bruns, 01/31/2003
- RE: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question, Lowden, James K, 01/31/2003
- RE: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question, Coleman, Dave, 01/31/2003
- RE: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question, Coleman, Dave, 01/31/2003
- RE: [freetds] UDP, freeTDS and a v0.61 question, Coleman, Dave, 01/31/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.