Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - Re: indent(1) bent

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Thompson, Bill D (London)" <ThompBil AT exchange.uk.ml.com>
  • To: "'TDS Development Group'" <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: indent(1) bent
  • Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 13:26:06 +0100


for my two cents, i'm with bob.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Kline [SMTP:bkline AT rksystems.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:28 PM
> To: TDS Development Group
> Subject: [freetds] Re: indent(1) bent
>
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2002, James K. Lowden wrote:
>
> > I like tabs. They're more flexible than blanks.
>
> I know this risks starting a religious bloodbath, but I'll register a
> different opinion. I think tabs are horrible. Ever since editors had
> the capability of visually representing tabs as a configurable number of
> spaces (a long time ago) I've worked on few multi-developer projects in
> which all the developers agreed on (a) whether tabs should be used and
> (b) how many spaces the tabs represent. As a result, most source code
> ends up very difficult to read, because no matter what you tell your
> editor about how to represent the tab, code which has been touched by
> more than one developer doesn't have consistent visual indentation.
> The only projects on which consistent, legible code had a prayer were
> those in which hard tabs were avoided completely.
>
> That's my 2 cents.
>
> --
> Bob Kline
> mailto:bkline AT rksystems.com
> http://www.rksystems.com
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to freetds as: [thompbil AT exchange.uk.ml.com]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
> $subst('Email.Unsub')





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page