FreeTDS Development Group

[Chris Eleveld <ihermit2 AT yahoo.com>]

In the interest of pursuing this lofty goal of getting
prototypes and other things in agreement, I have
downloaded the nightly snapshot.  I have run into a
problem with compilation.  It would appear that there
are compiler specific flags in the Makefile.in.  The
additions that do not seem to work for me(AIX Visual
Age For C++ batch compiler 5.02) are:
-Wp,-MD,.deps/$(*F).pp

Is this intentional?  And if so or not can somethign
be done about it?

--- "Craig A. Berry" <craigberry AT mac.com> wrote:
> At 8:49 AM -0800 1/23/02, Chris Eleveld wrote:
> >I've been pondering going through the sources and
> >cleaning up warnings and other ANSI issues due to
> >mismatched assignments adding/correcting prototypes
> >things like that.  Since, I suspect it will
> generate a
> >fairly hefty patch what are my chances of getting
> such
> >a moster accepted?
> 
> I have no idea what those who have check-in rights
> will say, but
> since such a patch would improve portability, allow
> for better
> optimizations by the compiler, and no doubt uncover
> a slew of latent
> bugs, I cast my vote in favor of it.  I'm pretty
> sure, for example,
> that I've seen places where an unsigned variable is
> compared to a
> negative constant; compilers with ANSI checking
> turned on will
> generally flag those.
> -- 
> ____________________________________________
> Craig A. Berry                  
> mailto:craigberry AT mac.com
> 
> "Literary critics usually know what they're
> talking about. Even if they're wrong."
>       -- Perl creator Larry Wall
> 
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to freetds as:
> [ihermit2 AT yahoo.com]
> To unsubscribe, forward this message to
$subst('Email.Unsub')


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com