freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "Ruffin Bailey" <Ruffin.Bailey AT noaa.gov>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: MS SQL Server 7.0
- Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 12:13:11 -0400
> Subject: Re: MS SQL Server 7.0
> Where specifically does it say it is not complete? Our implementation
> of TDS 4.2 is more mature than the 7.0 implementation, but there are many
> people using 7.0. SQL Server 7 will operate using either TDS 7.0 or 4.2
> (however 4.2 has some limitations such as truncation of long character
> fields).
I was wondering a little about that too -- from what I've read around
the web, you'd sometimes think 4.2 is the only way to go for SQL7 and
other times that you'd *need* to use 7. What exactly is the
"maturity-level" difference amount to in daily use?
Thanks!
Ruffin Bailey
-
MS SQL Server 7.0,
v, 09/06/2001
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: MS SQL Server 7.0, Brian Bruns, 09/06/2001
- Re: MS SQL Server 7.0, Curt Hagenlocher, 09/07/2001
- Re: MS SQL Server 7.0, Ruffin Bailey, 09/07/2001
- Re: MS SQL Server 7.0, Mark Lontsman, 09/07/2001
- Re: MS SQL Server 7.0, Curt Hagenlocher, 09/07/2001
- Re: MS SQL Server 7.0, Mark Lontsman, 09/07/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.