Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - Re: problems with make check

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Brian Bruns <camber AT ais.org>
  • To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
  • Subject: Re: problems with make check
  • Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:15:26 -0400 (EDT)


Ok, It's a libtool thing...Those symbols exist in libtds.(a|so) but make
check isn't finding it on you platform. *sigh*

Anybody with a solaris machine want to tackle this?

Will, everything should work fine, the tests are broken, not the library.
Do a make install and compile against SQSH if you really want to make sure
everything is fine.


Brian

On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Will Saxon wrote:

> I apologize if attachments are a no-no here, but I figured it would be
> smaller to send the output that way.
>
> Attached is a script-output containing a complete build log, from configure
> to make check. Also has my current environment settings.
>
> -Will
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Bruns [mailto:camber AT ais.org]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 6:33 PM
> > To: TDS Development Group
> > Subject: [freetds] Re: problems with make check
> >
> >
> >
> > Dang, I just sent the resonse to the wrong message...argh.
> >
> > Can you send the output of the make command, and I'll see
> > what I can find
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > On Thu, 31 May 2001, Will Saxon wrote:
> >
> > > Recompiling to use TDS 4.2 _does_ work. I am able to execute the TDS
> > > unittests correctly. Unfortunately, there is now a problem
> > with the next set
> > > of tests (ctlib). About 20 symbols in libct.so are
> > 'undefined,' which is
> > > really odd.
> > >
> > > I built from a clean source directory ('make distclean'ed)
> > and configured
> > > with --with-tdsver=4.2
> > >
> > > Thanks for the 4.2 suggestion.
> > >
> > > -Will
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Brian Bruns [mailto:camber AT ais.org]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:35 PM
> > > > To: TDS Development Group
> > > > Subject: [freetds] Re: problems with make check
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Will,
> > > >
> > > > There may be a problem with running TDS 7 on big endian
> > > > machines. I don't
> > > > recall if it was ever corrected, but if you are willing
> > to give some
> > > > input, we'll see if we can't get this straight.
> > > >
> > > > Firstly, try configuring using './configure
> > > > --with-tdsver=4.2' and see if
> > > > that works.
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 21 May 2001, Will Saxon wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I realize this may have been covered in previous posts.. I
> > > > think this
> > > > > situation is slightly different though.
> > > > >
> > > > > I cannot get FreeTDS 'make check' to work properly on a
> > Sun Ultra-60
> > > > > running Solaris 2.6. We have to use 2.6 because of another
> > > > application we
> > > > > run that only works with 2.6.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have a Microsoft SQL Server (v7.0) running on another
> > > > machine. I have
> > > > > configured FreeTDS to build for TDS version 7.0. I have
> > > > specified the SQL
> > > > > server name in /etc/hosts to avoid some of the other
> > > > problems I have read
> > > > > about. FreeTDS compiles just fine, but when I 'make
> > check' I get the
> > > > > following:
> > > > >
> > > > > t000#.c: Test stuff
> > > > > tds_connect() failed
> > > > > try_tds_login() failed
> > > > > FAIL: t000#
> > > > >
> > > > > every single time. I have verified that the FreeTDS machine
> > > > is actually
> > > > > attempting to connect to the SQL server - using a packet
> > > > sniffer I can see
> > > > > packets coming in. The database is not in single user mode
> > > > or anything
> > > > > like that. Note that I do not get the 'cannot assign
> > > > requested address'
> > > > > thing.
> > > > >
> > > > > One thing that I have NOT done is set any environment
> > > > variables. Since I
> > > > > have not actually installed FreeTDS (I run make check
> > > > before installing) I
> > > > > have not set $SYBASE or anything like that.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have performed another build on a separate machine (x86
> > > > based FreeBSD
> > > > > 4.3-STABLE) with no problems. I had everything configured
> > > > the exact same
> > > > > way, with the same information in PWD and interfaces. It
> > > > worked the first
> > > > > time, no problems at all. I have a few test scripts that I
> > > > written already
> > > > > (using DBI and DBD::Sybase) and they all work just great. I
> > > > don't think I
> > > > > am the problem with the situation.
> > > > >
> > > > > One thing I just did was I compared logs from a successful
> > > > test on the
> > > > > FreeBSD machine with an unsuccessful one on the Solaris
> > machine. The
> > > > > initial packet sent is very similar in both tests, but not
> > > > exactly the
> > > > > same. Several bytes seem to shifted or swapped. Is this
> > > > just a difference
> > > > > between big and little endian bit ordering? Is this the
> > > > problem? I can
> > > > > proved copies of the logs to anyone who wants to look.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am really interested in using this software for this
> > > > project. It seems
> > > > > to be the best way to do things. If only I could get it
> > to work! :).
> > > > >
> > > > > -Will
> > > >





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page