corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
[Corpus-Paul] The logic connection between Rom 4:1-8 and 9
- From: moon AT mail.sogang.ac.kr
- To: corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [Corpus-Paul] The logic connection between Rom 4:1-8 and 9
- Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 14:00:59 +0900
Dear co-interpreters, recently I happened to think about Rom 4:1-9 again. This is a crucial passage in the "battle" between the New Perspective and the more traditional interpretation. The question of Rom 4:9a is important to understand Rom 4: This blessing, then - is it given (only) to the circumcised or to the uncircumcised also? This question reminds us of the question of 3:29: Or, is God the God of Jews only? not the God of Gentiles also? It indicates that the issue Paul addresses in Rom 4:1-9 is quite similar to the issue Paul addresses in Rom 3:27-31. Anyway, my question is how this question is logically connected to the previous paragraph 4:1-8. I can think of two ways to link 4:9a to the previous paragraph. I would like to hear comments about each. (1) The first key to interpretation is to ask: Is 4:9a a rhetorical question or a genuine question? Suppose that 4:9a is a rhetorical question. Then it means that the paragraph of 4:1-8 implies the answer "also to the uncircumcised" to the question. Then, we can reasonably assume that by "EX ERGWN" (from works) and "CWRIS ERGWN" (apart from works), Paul refers to the works of Torah, which can be done only by the Jews who possess Torah. If both Abraham and David (or the person whom he refers to) were justified apart from works of Torah, which only the uncircumcised can perform, it would imply that the blessing of justification is given to the circumcised (represented by David) and to the uncircumcised as well (represented by Abraham). Rom 4:9b-10 confirms or explain the answer "also to the uncircumcised", implicit in the paragraph 4:1-8, by means of a clearer argument. (2) Suppose that 4:9a is a genuine question, whose answer is not implied in the paragraph 4:1-8 or vaguely implied in it. Then 4:9b-10 provides the answer to the question. In this case, "not from works" or "apart from works" does not necessarily imply that the blessing is also given to the uncircumcised. That claim should be further argued. Then we do not have to assume that by "EX ERGWN" (from works) and "CWRIS ERGWN" (apart from works), Paul refers to the works of Torah, which can be performed only by the Jews. Any comments? Moon R.Jung Associate Professor Dept of Media Tech Sogang Univ, Seoul, Korea Moon R. Jung Associate Professor Dept of Media Technology Graduate School of Media Comm Sogang Univ, Seoul, Korea |
-
[Corpus-Paul] The logic connection between Rom 4:1-8 and 9,
moon, 04/02/2004
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] The logic connection between Rom 4:1-8 and 9, Harold R. Holmyard III, 04/03/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: Re: [Corpus-Paul] The logic connection between Rom 4:1-8 and 9,
moon, 04/04/2004
- Re: Re: [Corpus-Paul] The logic connection between Rom 4:1-8 and 9, Harold R. Holmyard III, 04/04/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.