corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Stephen C. Carlson" <scarlson AT mindspring.com>
- To: Corpus-Paul <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Corpus-Paul] Romans 1:16
- Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 03:27:33 -0400
At 10:25 AM 10/10/03 -0500, Jeffrey B. Gibson wrote:
>OU GAR EPAISXUNOMAI TO EUAGGELION, DUNAMIS GAR QEOU ESTIN EIS SWTHRIAN
>
>If memory serves (and I don't have the opportunity at the moment to
>consult any commentaries) this statement by Paul is usually taken to be
>an attempt at offering a definition of what the "gospel" **is** -- as if
>somehow this needed clarifying.
As far as I can tell (e.g. BDF ยง 472), that is the normal word order,
so there's nothing emphatic going on. I suppose you could turn the
tables by controverting the claim that ESTIN is emphatic when the
word order does not support it.
Stephen Carlson
--
Stephen C. Carlson mailto:scarlson AT mindspring.com
Synoptic Problem Home Page http://www.mindspring.com/~scarlson/synopt/
"Poetry speaks of aspirations, and songs chant the words." Shujing 2.35
-
[Corpus-Paul] Romans 1:16,
Jeffrey B. Gibson, 10/10/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Romans 1:16, Moises Mayordomo, 10/10/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Romans 1:16, Mark D. Nanos, 10/10/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Romans 1:16, Jack Kilmon, 10/10/2003
- Re: [Corpus-Paul] Romans 1:16, Stephen C. Carlson, 10/11/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.