corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Corpus-Paul

List archive

[Corpus-Paul] Re: Pseudepigraphy

From: MillerJimE AT aol.com
To: corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [Corpus-Paul] Re: Pseudepigraphy
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 20:18:15 EDT

<<One treatment I rather like is James D. Miller, THE PASTORAL
LETTERS AS COMPOSITE DOCUMENTS (SNTSMS 93; Cambridge: CUP,
1997). Is that your book?>>

No, I am James E Miller. I have also been confused with James C Miller
(New Testament), James F Miller (Old Testament), and James R Mueller
(Intertestamental). Maybe I should always use my middle initial, but
sometimes even that does not work.
Jim Miller
>From fwhughes AT sunbeach.net Mon Apr 7 15:46:06 2003
Return-Path: <fwhughes AT sunbeach.net>
Delivered-To: corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: from name2.sunbeach.net (name2.sunbeach.net [205.214.199.131])
by happyhouse.metalab.unc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2110C2011A
for <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>;
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:46:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sunbeach.net (mail.sunbeach.net [205.214.199.134])
by name2.sunbeach.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA16830
for <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 15:45:04 -0400
Received: from sunbeach.net [66.205.14.197] by sunbeach.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-6.06) id A6335379010E; Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:49:07 -0400
Message-ID: <3E91D55F.7080804 AT sunbeach.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:45:35 -0400
From: "Frank W. Hughes" <fwhughes AT sunbeach.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US;
rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Corpus-Paul <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [Corpus-Paul] Paul the Author
References: <200304061752.h36Hq2iG009331 AT ccat.sas.upenn.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------040305080708050701070603"
X-Declude-Sender: fwhughes AT sunbeach.net [66.205.14.197]
X-Declude-Spoolname: Dd63310e.SMD
X-BeenThere: corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Corpus-Paul <corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Id: Corpus-Paul <corpus-paul.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/corpus-paul>,
<mailto:corpus-paul-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/corpus-paul>
List-Post: <mailto:corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/corpus-paul>,
<mailto:corpus-paul-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 19:46:06 -0000

--------------040305080708050701070603
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I certainly second what Bob Kraft said. Some of you know I spent my
Fulbright year in Göttingen in 1986-87. I read absolutely everything I
could get my hands on concerning pseudonymity. I came back from Germany
with the convinction that we should be as frank about pseudonymity in
the NT as classicists are about pseudonymity in Graeco-Roman literature.
I also am quite convinced that there is no single litmus test for
pseudonymity in the Pauline corpus, but that you have to look at a
multiplicity of little arguments. The best example of this approach is
Wolfgang Trilling, Untersuchungen zum Zweiten Thessalonicherbrief. His
synthetic approach, I think, changed a lot of minds in Germany about the
authorship of 2 Thessalonians.

Frank W. Hughes
Lecturer in NT Studies
Codrington College
Barbados

--------------040305080708050701070603
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
I certainly second what Bob Kraft said.  Some of you know I spent my
Fulbright
year in Göttingen in 1986-87.  I read absolutely everything I could
get my
hands on concerning pseudonymity.  I came back from Germany with the
convinction
that we should be as frank about pseudonymity in the NT as classicists are
about pseudonymity in Graeco-Roman literature.  I also am quite convinced
that there is no single litmus test for pseudonymity in the Pauline corpus,
but that you have to look at a multiplicity of little arguments.  The
best
example of this approach is Wolfgang Trilling, Untersuchungen zum Zweiten
Thessalonicherbrief.  His synthetic approach, I think, changed a lot
of minds in Germany about the authorship of 2 Thessalonians. 
 
Frank W. Hughes 
Lecturer in NT Studies 
Codrington College 
Barbados 
</body>
</html>

--------------040305080708050701070603--

[Corpus-Paul] RE: Pseudepigraphy, Given, Mark Douglas, 04/04/2003
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [Corpus-Paul] Re: Pseudepigraphy, MillerJimE, 04/06/2003
- [Corpus-Paul] Re: Pseudepigraphy, RSBrenchley, 04/10/2003