corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Loren Rosson <rossoiii AT yahoo.com>
- To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: '14 years' of preparation/seclusion
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 04:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
To Roy Ciampa:
Roy, somehow your posting dated Saturday only arrived
this morning via my email. Here are some observations:
> I think the reader of Galatians would
> understand that since God's encounter
> with Paul was in order that he might
> "preach Christ among the Gentiles" (1:16)
> that that was what he went to do when
> he went to Arabia and then return to
> Damascus. Indeed the reader's suspicion
> that that was the case would have been
> confirmed in 1:23 when Paul informs them
> that the report was going around that
> "The man who formerly persecuted us is
> now preaching the faith."
Yes! Francis Watson argued that Paul began preaching
to Gentiles only after a long period of repeatedly
failing to win Jews to the gospel. This, however,
ignores the blatant testimony youve indicated, and
its based on a tendentious reading of Rom.
11:11-12,15,17,19-20, (Jewish stumbling which led to
Gentile salvation) -- which Watson sees as reflecting
not a general state of affairs but rather Pauls
personal missionary experience.
> In the context of the 14 years
> mentioned in 2:1, Paul says that
> he went to present "the gospel that
> I preach among the Gentiles" (2:2),
> the present tense clearly implying
> that the gospel he was preaching
> to the Galatians and others was the
> same gospel he had preached from
> the time of his conversion up
> until that encounter in Jerusalem.
I agree.
> That was the message to which the
> Jerusalem leaders had "added
> nothing" (2:6),
-- except, of course, the franchise fee (the
collection). Paul may come across as blasé about the
matter when he says, the only thing they asked of me.
. . (2:10), but thats face-saving. If we read behind
the lines, its not hard to deduce that the pillars
had strongarmed Paul into a quid pro quo.
> So it seems extremely unlikely that
> the original readers of Galatians would
> have thought that Paul had had a 14 year
> period of relative inactivity, of
> seclusion or preparation. The text
> clearly indicates that they had been 14
> very active years in which Paul had been
> involved in preaching the gospel to
> Gentiles with great/powerful results
> that caused the Jerusalem leadership
> to recognize that God was at work
> through his ministry.
I agree with everything as stated here, only (as
youve gathered from my previous postings) I would put
14 year period and 14 very active years in
quotation marks to indicate, symbolically, a period
that may have been only (say) 6 years. I agree with
you that Paul was very active from the start of his
conversion, but I somehow doubt it took 14 years to
bring Gentile controversies to the forefront in
Jerusalem.
> I don't see symbolism in the reference
> to 14 years. But I do see quite a few
> elements of intertextuality in the passage.
> Anyone interested those elements can
> consult pages 130ff. in my book, The Presence
> and Function of Scripture in
> Galatians 1 and 2 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1988).
Thanks for the reference; Ill look into it.
Loren Rosson III
Nashua NH
rossoiii AT yahoo.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
- Re: '14 years' of preparation/seclusion, Loren Rosson, 04/04/2001
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.