corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: pmh15 AT cam.ac.uk (Peter M. Head)
- To: "Corpus-paul" <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: RE: Galatian situation
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 12:26:38 +0100
Martin's argument re Gal 4.10 (NTS 42 (1996), 105ff) is not perhaps as
persuasive as previous contributors have suggested.
He himself affirms only that the time-keeping terms in 4.10 are compatible
with either Judaism or paganism; and that 'only the context can determine
the issue'.
But in dealing with the context he dismisses altogether too casually the
link which _stoicheia_ establishes between 4.9 and 4.3 (and hence the whole
previous section). Clearly Paul is linking the proposed action (polemically
and ironically) with a return to national deities; but this seems entirely
compatible with the "traditional" view.
It is notable that Gal 4.10 lacks any explicitly cultic aspects of Jewish
time-keeping. This might reflect the cosmic side of time-keeping and the
fact that cultic practices (and certainly pilgrimmages) might either have
been down-played by the agitators or in any case be incumbent upon
circumcision in any case.
Some thogughts
Peter
Dr. Peter M. Head
Tyndale House
36 Selwyn Gardens
Cambridge CB3 9BA
Tel: 01223 566607
Fax: 01223 566608
email: pmh15 AT cam.ac.uk
-
RE: Galatian situation,
Elli Elliott, 09/12/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: Galatian situation, Peter M. Head, 09/13/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Richard Fellows, 09/13/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Peter M. Head, 09/14/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/18/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Elli Elliott, 09/18/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/19/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Elli Elliott, 09/19/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Dieter Mitternacht, 09/20/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/20/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Dieter Mitternacht, 09/20/2000
- RE: Galatian situation, Mark D. Nanos, 09/20/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.