corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: Jim West <jwest AT highland.net>
- To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Eisenman on James
- Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 13:32:11 -0400
At 11:09 AM 4/13/99 -0500, you wrote:
>R. Eisenman on James has been invoked a couple of times on this list in the
>last few days. I kind of assumed he was another off-the-wall guy who had
>spent too much time in the sun without a hat on. I haven't sought out
>reviews of his book in the scholarly press, but I wonder what list readers
>think of his book, and if there's a sense of how NT scholars as a group
>have received his work. (Again, I'm a non-specialist who teaches NT. I
>value this list as an important resource for teaching and am grateful to be
>able to pose the occasional question.)
Eisenman's views are idiosyncratic (to put it kindly) and he has been
virtually completely refuted by those who work on the DSS for a living. His
notions of James and Jesus are so absolutely unsupportable that there is no
one, and I mean no one, who agrees with him.
best,
Jim
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Jim West, ThD
Petros Baptist Church- Pastor
Quartz Hill School of Theology- Adjunct Prof. of Bible
fax- 978-231-5986
email- jwest AT highland.net
web page- http://web.infoave.net/~jwest
-
Eisenman on James,
Patrick Nugent, 04/13/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Eisenman on James, Jeffrey B. Gibson, 04/13/1999
- Re: Eisenman on James, Jim West, 04/13/1999
- Re: Eisenman on James, FucciXXV, 04/13/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.