corpus-paul AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Corpus-Paul
List archive
- From: "Sheila E. McGinn, Ph.D." <smcginn AT jcu.edu>
- To: Corpus-paul <corpus-paul AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Sequence of the letters
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 12:22:14 -0500
John, thanks for your outline. Can you spell out why you put Galatians after
the
"prison letters" rather than before them?
"John C. Hurd" wrote:
(snip)
> Jerusalem visit (conference; collection begins)
> 1 Corinthians
> Philippians
> 2 Corinthians 1 9
> Galatians
> Romans
> (2 Corinthians 10 13)
(snip)
> Concerning sequence it seems to me clear (1) that relative dating should
> precede
> absolute dating, and (2) that the letters (the primary sources) should be
> allowed to
> speak for themselves without the influence of Acts (a secondary source for
> Paul).
BTW, I agree totally with both of these methodological points.
Sheila McGinn
-
Re: Sequence of the letters,
John C. Hurd, 03/31/1999
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: Sequence of the letters, Sheila E. McGinn, Ph.D., 03/31/1999
- Re: Sequence of the letters, John C. Hurd, 03/31/1999
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.