Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

chpac-staff - Re: [Chpac-staff] priorities memo

chpac-staff AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Chpac-staff mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Steve Wright" <swright AT townofchapelhill.org>
  • To: <chpac-staff AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [Chpac-staff] priorities memo
  • Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:28:13 -0500

Hello All,

 

Pasted below is a reply from Dick sent Friday morning.  It didn’t go through for some reason.

 

-Steve

 

Because the rationale underlying my draft of "public art priorities" for 2008-2009 was not adequately expained, I offer these additional thoughts in anticipation of our December 12 meeting.

 

My first reaction to the Mayor's invitation to comment was that, because our functional relationship with town government will end in a few weeks, our organization wil have no town-funded budget in 2008-2009 and thus it would srve no relevant purpose to participate in the town's prelminary budget planning.  However, upon reflection and following my conversation with the Town Manager, my draft communication to you was intendd to suggest the possible value of draeig on our four-year experience as a so-called special commission of the town to offer some thoughts about emphases the new town infrastructure might wish to consider next year.

 

Although some--if not all--of us may choose to accept the opportunity to serve in the first class of members of the new town public art commission, his may be the last opportunity for our corporationto speak with one voice abot how the town could build on the legacy we have enerated to date.  In short,this could be our corporate "swan song" as a special commission of the town.

 

Consistent with the approach intended by my draft, consideration was not limited to matters on which we have reached definitive agreement in the past.  Rather, it also includes visions about new opportunities for the future that have been the subject of our informal discussions from time to time.

 

An impediment to offering some such potentially useful advice may be the limited time available, before December 15, to craft a consensus document.  Alternative approaches coud be (1) a later separate communication from us, unconstrained by the budget cycle, or (2) no such report, with reliance instead on our membership in the new town commission to perpetuate consideration of tomn intiatives that we individually or colletively believe are important.

 

In conclusion, two questions could be on the agenda for December 12: (1) Do we wish to offer any such proposed blueprint for the future, either now or later; and (2) if so, what recommendations might we make. 

 

 

 

 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page