Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ch-scene - Re: Question for musically inclined

ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: RTP-area local music and culture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Chris Rossi <rossi AT webslingerZ.com>
  • To: ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: Question for musically inclined
  • Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 01:07:18 -0500

Tim Harper wrote:
> FYI - bad experiences with old, old versions of cubase. Never had a bad time
> with Nuendo, yet.
>
It's actually funny that SX/SL are even called Cubase as it really has
little to do with any version of Cubase that preceded it. It really is
just Nuendo under the hood. At least the audio portion of it. I'm
using 1.0 and it's rock solid. I have the 2.0 upgrade (I bought late
enough that I got it for free) but haven't installed it yet. I saw some
posts on rec.audio.pro with people having some performance problems with
it, so I'm waiting for a maintenance/bugfix release or two before
actually trying it out.

Before Cubase I had been using Nuendo 1.5--the transition to Cubase was
nothing. The interface looked a little prettier, but basically
everything I used was the same. And it ran a little faster, and lacked
some of the bugs of Nuendo 1.5. I haven't used the newer Nuendo. The
project files for both Cubase/Nuendo are compatible with each other and
can open in either program.

> Never tried cubase again. There is an SL version of Cubase
> that is even cheaper, isn't there?
>
Yes. It's basically just SX minus some features. The biggest is they
get rid of the automation. Which for me is one of the big reasons to
use a computer in the first place, so it wasn't really an option for me.
Can't remember what else they took out. Definitely worth looking at
the features of both and deciding if you really need what SX has that SL
doesn't.

Oh, and incicentally, while I can't say from first hand experience,
having used ProTools myself only a handful of times in unfamiliar
listening environments, a lot of folks say the Cubase/Nuendo audio
engine sounds better. Steinberg says it's because they use 32bit floats
for everything internally. I have a hard time imagining any serious
program doesn't use floats, though, so I don't know if that's really a
difference or not.

Oh, and for those looking for a very economical option I used to play
with N-track which was pretty good when it wasn't having stability
problems. And I could never get the midi to work without locking up the
computer. But it may have just not liked my hardware. Anyway it could
be worth looking at:

http://www.fasoft.com/

rossi
--
http://spacelabstudio.com


-- ch-scene: the mailing list that mirrors a.m.c-h --
http://webmail8.isis.unc.edu:81/read/?forum=ch-scene




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page