cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Cc-uk mailing list
List archive
- From: Rob Myers <robmyers AT mac.com>
- To: cc-uk <cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 09:30:07 +0100
On 27 Jun 2005, at 23:45, J. Grant wrote:
IMHO the missing link here is open standards. I don't care if
I'm using non-Free software, so long as the core data structures
are based on open standards that let me switch to alternate
software whenever I care to....
Agreed.
I dissent. :-) If the non-free software isn't available for my platform, or if I'm supporting software that could embrace & extend, corrupt, or drop support for the format, I don't think it's a good idea.
Let us hope that CC will finally switch from Macromedia Flash to W3C's SVG / XHTML / CSS / JavaScript.
They'll need the tools. Free Software will have to support Free Culture here.
I was looking at maps.google.co.uk earlier, it looks great, but I think most of the functionality is server side.
Google Maps is an "AJAX" application. The interesting functionality is client-side Javascript. This shows how a Keynote-style applciation could be written in DHTML.
- Rob.
-
Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?
, (continued)
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, Tom Chance, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, David M. Berry, 06/22/2005
- RE: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, David Hirst, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, J. Grant, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, J. Grant, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, David Illsley, 06/23/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, J. Grant, 06/23/2005
- RE: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, David Hirst, 06/24/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, Dan Brickley, 06/27/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, J. Grant, 06/27/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, Rob Myers, 06/28/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, Neil Leyton, 06/23/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] CC going mad?, Cory Doctorow, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] CC going mad?, David M. Berry, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] CC going mad?, Rob Myers, 06/22/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.