cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Cc-uk mailing list
List archive
- From: "J. Grant" <jg AT jguk.org>
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri AT w3.org>
- Cc: cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 23:45:25 +0100
Hi Dan
IMHO the missing link here is open standards. I don't care if
I'm using non-Free software, so long as the core data structures
are based on open standards that let me switch to alternate
software whenever I care to....
Agreed. Let us hope that CC will finally switch from Macromedia Flash to W3C's SVG / XHTML / CSS / JavaScript.
Do you know of any good showcases we could use to illustrate open web standards are better than Flash?
I was looking at maps.google.co.uk earlier, it looks great, but I think most of the functionality is server side.
Kind regards
JG
--
Homepage: http://jguk.org/
Blog: http://jguk.org/blog.rss
Radio: http://jguk.org/#radio
-
[Cc-uk] FS vs CC?
, (continued)
- [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, Andres Guadamuz, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, Tom Chance, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, David M. Berry, 06/22/2005
- RE: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, David Hirst, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, J. Grant, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, J. Grant, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, David Illsley, 06/23/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, J. Grant, 06/23/2005
- RE: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, David Hirst, 06/24/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, Dan Brickley, 06/27/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, J. Grant, 06/27/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, Rob Myers, 06/28/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] FS vs CC?, Neil Leyton, 06/23/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] CC going mad?, Cory Doctorow, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] CC going mad?, David M. Berry, 06/22/2005
- Re: [Cc-uk] CC going mad?, Rob Myers, 06/22/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.