cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Cc-uk mailing list
List archive
[Cc-uk] Johnathan's comment: 3 Jurisdictions within the UK
- From: "Yoav" <yoav AT creativecommons.org>
- To: <cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [Cc-uk] Johnathan's comment: 3 Jurisdictions within the UK
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:07:11 +0200
Dear Jonathan, Thank you for
your important comment! I will put it
to the Legal Advisory Board, and especially to your countryman Professor Hector
Macqueen. Cheers Yo'av Yo'av Mazeh Project Lead, iCommons-UK Research Fellow Programme in Comparative Media Law and
Policy Centre for Socio-Legal Studies From:
cc-uk-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:cc-uk-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Mitchell Sent: To:
cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org Subject:
[Cc-uk] This isn't a Proposed clause
8g includes this: "Šthis Licence
shall be governed by English law and the parties irrevocably submit to the exclusive
jurisdiction of the English Courts." There are three
legal systems and three jurisdictions in the There are three
solutions: 1 sub-editions
for Northern Ireland, Scotland, and England/Wales; 2 a UK edition, in which the
following would be substituted in clause 8g: "Šthis Licence shall be governed by
the law of the jurisdiction in which the licensor is domiciled in terms of Part
V of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 and the parties irrevocably
submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of that jurisdiction." (for up to
date version of Part V see
http://www.jonathanmitchell.info/section41.html ); or 3 no choice of law
provision, leaving consequences to be governed substantially by the 1982 Act,
the Rome Convention, and the Private International Law (Miscellaneous
Provisions) Act 1995 (as they are by the current international draft). Any solution
requires different language elsewhere, e.g. 5a ii and 8h, but what that
language might be would depend on the choice. My preference is for 1; I am not
attracted by an exclusive jurisdiction clause such as 2 which does not state
which jurisdiction is exclusive, and (standing the proposals of, and
uncertainty surrounding, the Rome II proposals) 3 is an undesirable solution
though still better for us than the current draft. If however the
project were to proceed on the current draft, it should be renamed as ' I suggest a
policy decision be taken on this issue before detailed drafting. Jonathan -- Jonathan
Mitchell QC Work
telephone/mobile: 0773 963 9343 Faculty
internal mobile extension: 3349 Fax to laptop:
0870 124 8222 Business
address: Advocates Library, Parliament House, Website: http://www.jonathanmitchell.info Home address: This message, and
any attachments, may contain legally privileged material and are confidential
to the intended recipient. Please note
that my clerk is Iain Murray; tel. 0131 260 5697; fax 0131 220 2654; e-mail
murraystable AT advocates.org.uk . Instructions as counsel should unless otherwise
notified be channelled via him. _______________________________________________ Cc-uk mailing
list Cc-uk AT lists.ibiblio.org http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-uk |
- [Cc-uk] Johnathan's comment: 3 Jurisdictions within the UK, Yoav, 02/28/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.