Development of the Creative Commons Sampling license (or license option)

[Don Joyce <dj AT webbnet.com>]

The many connotations of Cut And Paste is a good thing, not a bad 
thing. All the newly invented terminology has practically no 
connotations or familiarity within general knowledge at all....
DJ





> for what it's worth.
>
> my current favorites:
>
> sampling license,
> re-create license,
>
> and
>
> transform / transformation license (which someone at work came up with
> today).
>
> i think that "derivative license" is out, for the reasons cory and lisa
> have listed.
>
> i agree with sarah on the many connotations "cut and paste."
>
> glenn
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 15:48:36 -0400, "Sarah Brown"
> <sbrown AT old.law.columbia.edu> said:
> >  On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 11:51:53AM -0700, Cory Doctorow wrote:
> >  > cut-and-paste license works for me, too
> >
> >  It's short-and-sweet but I fear it has slight negative connotations.
> >
> >  It's quite possible I'm entirely warped from immersion in the culture
> >  of Washington DC. I imagine the demographics of a free association
> >  word game breaking down something like this:
> >
> >  California
> >  New York
> >  Massachusetts
> >  Illinois
> >  Olympia, Washington ->
> >
> >  "cut and paste"
> >
> >         "legitimate artmaking"
> >
> >
> >  Washington DC ->
> >
> >  "cut and paste"
> >
> > 	"dirty free-loading copying pirates without a creative bone 
> > in their bodies"
> >
> >
> >  Cyberspace ->
> >
> >  "cut and paste"
> >
> >         "ctrl-x, ctrl-v"
> >
> >
> >  The Rest of America ->
> >
> >  "cut and paste"
> >
> >         "kindergarten art project"
> >
> >
> >
> >  > On Monday, September 15, 2003, at 11:18  AM, Sarah Brown wrote:
> >  >
> >  > >On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:48:18AM -0700, mark / negativland wrote:
> >  > >>   The  NY times had a lot of stories the other day about file
> >  > >>sharing and
> >  > >>   copying......here's a  good one about the shifting media/cultural
> >  > >>sea our
> >  > >>   new  license will be swimming in.......
> >  > >>   mark
> >  > >>   September 14, 2003
> >  > >>   http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/14/fashion/14COPY.html
> >  > >>   Beyond File-Sharing, a Nation of Copiers
> >  > >>   By JOHN LELAND
> >  > >
> >  > >>   "Lara Croft Tomb Raider: The Cradle of Life.") But together they
> >  > >>suggest a
> >  > >>   broad relationship between new technology and a value system that
> >  > >>seems
> >  > >>   shaped to it. In a nation that flaunts its capacities to produce
> >  > >>and
> >  > >>   consume, much of the culture's heat now lies with the ability to
> >  > >>cut,
> >  > >>   paste, clip, sample, quote, recycle, customize and recirculate. It
> >  > >>is
> >  > >
> >  > >Re: the name of the sampling licence. I'm very fond of:
> >  > >
> >  > >The "cut, paste, clip, sample, quote, recycle, customize and
> >  > >recirculate" Licence.
> >  > >
> >  > >Or,
> >  > >
> >  > >The Give and Take Licence for Use in Sampling and Collage.
> >  > >
> >  > >But my best guess is that either of these names, or any other name we
> >  > >chose, would inevitably get reduced to
> >  > >
> >  > >"The Sampling Licence",
> >  > >
> >  > >which would be perfectly adequate.
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > >so that's my vote,
> >  > >
> >  > >Sarah
> >  > ><mime-attachment>_______________________________________________
> >  > >cc-sampling mailing list
> >  > >cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >  > >http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-sampling
> >  >
> >  > _______________________________________________
> >  > cc-sampling mailing list
> >  > cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
> >  > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-sampling
> ---------------------
> Glenn Otis Brown
> Executive Director
> Creative Commons
> glenn AT creativecommons.org
> +1.650.723.7572 (telephone)
> +1.415.336.1433 (mobile)
> _______________________________________________
> cc-sampling mailing list
> cc-sampling AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-sampling