cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: discussion of the Creative Commons Metadata work
List archive
Re: cc:Agent, foaf:Agent (and/was Re: dc:identifier)
- From: Mike Linksvayer <ml AT creativecommons.org>
- To: cc-metadata AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: cc:Agent, foaf:Agent (and/was Re: dc:identifier)
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 13:45:09 -0800
Lucas Gonze wrote:
The disadvantage is getting too close to RDF. Right now developers can get away with treating CC metadata as XML, which is good for adoption.
<dc:creator>
<cc:Agent>
<dc:title>foo</dc:title>
</cc:Agent>
</dc:creator>
vs.
<dc:creator>
<foaf:Agent>
<foaf:name>foo</foaf:name>
</foaf:Agent>
</dc:creator>
Still could, no?
Aside: I'm not sure why foaf:name exists when dc:title would seem to suit the purpose.
--
Mike Linksvayer
http://creativecommons.org/learn/aboutus/people#21
-
cc:Agent, foaf:Agent (and/was Re: dc:identifier),
Mike Linksvayer, 01/05/2004
-
Re: cc:Agent, foaf:Agent (and/was Re: dc:identifier),
Lucas Gonze, 01/07/2004
-
Re: cc:Agent, foaf:Agent (and/was Re: dc:identifier),
Mike Linksvayer, 01/07/2004
-
Re: cc:Agent, foaf:Agent,
Lucas Gonze, 01/07/2004
- Re: cc:Agent, foaf:Agent, Mike Linksvayer, 01/08/2004
-
Re: cc:Agent, foaf:Agent,
Lucas Gonze, 01/07/2004
-
Re: cc:Agent, foaf:Agent (and/was Re: dc:identifier),
Mike Linksvayer, 01/07/2004
-
Re: cc:Agent, foaf:Agent (and/was Re: dc:identifier),
Lucas Gonze, 01/07/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.