cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses

From: Sarah Pearson <sarah AT creativecommons.org>
Cc: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 17:11:00 -0700

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Anthony <ok AT theendput.com> wrote:

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Sarah Pearson <sarah AT creativecommons.org> wrote:

We propose changing the ND licenses to make it clear that licensees may create adaptations so long as those adaptations are not shared publicly.

So if an adaptation you made ever gets shared publicly, your creation of it is retroactively made illegal?

I'm not sure you can do that.

No, the creation of the adaptation will never be made illegal. It is the sharing (as defined in the licenses) that will be.

[cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Sarah Pearson, 10/18/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Anthony, 10/18/2013
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Anthony, 10/21/2013
      - Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Peter Brink, 10/22/2013
        
        Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Anthony, 10/22/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, maiki, 10/19/2013
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Anthony, 10/19/2013
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Paul Keller, 10/19/2013
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Gisle Hannemyr, 10/21/2013
  - Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Marketply, 10/21/2013
    - Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Anthony, 10/21/2013