cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses
- From: Paul Keller <pk AT kl.nl>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 20:40:18 +0200
On Saturday, October 19, 2013 at 10:29 , maiki wrote:
Do the other licenses have those clauses in the legal code? Does callingit out in the ND licenses make it ambiguous for the non-ND licenses?I don't think it is a bad idea, but if I were comparing licenses, andthe most restrictive license gave explicit permission, then I wouldquestion how the other licenses apply; perhaps I would read the SAlicense as requiring that I make the data mining output publiclyavailable under the same license.
I had a very similar first reaction. why limit this to ND? it should also be clarified for the SA licenses. since they also have condition that only kick in when the adapted work is redistributed but do not need to be complied with when making modifications of the licensed work and using them privately.
best, paul
-
[cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Sarah Pearson, 10/18/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/18/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Peter Brink, 10/22/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Anthony, 10/22/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Peter Brink, 10/22/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
maiki, 10/19/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Anthony, 10/19/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Paul Keller, 10/19/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Gisle Hannemyr, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Marketply, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/21/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Marketply, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Marketply, 10/22/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Gisle Hannemyr, 10/22/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Marketply, 10/22/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Marketply, 10/21/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Sarah Pearson, 10/23/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/18/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.