cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses
- From: maiki <maiki AT interi.org>
- To: cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses
- Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 01:29:00 -0700
On 10/18/2013 01:38 PM, Sarah Pearson wrote:
> Before we lock the legal code and publish the license suite, we have one
> final change to propose for the two ND licenses only.
>
> /We propose changing the ND licenses to make it clear that licensees may
> create adaptations so long as those adaptations are not shared publicly./
>
> This change would make it unambiguous that adapting licensed works for
> personal or private use is permitted under any of the 6 licenses in the
> CC suite.
Do the other licenses have those clauses in the legal code? Does calling
it out in the ND licenses make it ambiguous for the non-ND licenses?
I don't think it is a bad idea, but if I were comparing licenses, and
the most restrictive license gave explicit permission, then I would
question how the other licenses apply; perhaps I would read the SA
license as requiring that I make the data mining output publicly
available under the same license.
maiki
-
[cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Sarah Pearson, 10/18/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/18/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Peter Brink, 10/22/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Anthony, 10/22/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Peter Brink, 10/22/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
maiki, 10/19/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Anthony, 10/19/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Paul Keller, 10/19/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Gisle Hannemyr, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Marketply, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/21/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Marketply, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Sarah Pearson, 10/21/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Marketply, 10/22/2013
- Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses, Gisle Hannemyr, 10/22/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Marketply, 10/21/2013
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Proposed change to the ND licenses,
Anthony, 10/18/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.