cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses
List archive
Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing
- From: Sarah Pearson <sarah AT creativecommons.org>
- To: Development of Creative Commons licenses <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 14:44:38 -0700
Glad to see the discussion about the treatment of moral rights. I do want to clarify one point from Rob's email. Version 4.0 does have language designed to address fair dealing and other limitations and exceptions to copyright. It is in Section 2(a)(i): "You can make any and all uses of the Licensed Work for which permission is not required under Applicable Copyright and Neighboring Rights without regard to this Public License."
Of course, if people think this language is not clear or could be made more prominent, we would definitely like to know. This is an incredibly important component of the licenses.
best,
Sarah
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Rob Myers <rob AT robmyers.org> wrote:
On 05/01/2012 06:23 AM, Gisle Hannemyr wrote:I see that the language used is from from Berne:
>
> At the present time, I have no better suggestion than keeping
> the compromise about moral rights that were used in
> CCPL ver. 3.0 in ver. 4.0 of the CC public license.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_rights_%28copyright_law%29#Berne_Convention
4.0d1 also removes the statement that the licenses do not reduce fair
use/fair dealing rights. I would *very* much like to see this restored.
So possibly mentioning that the licenses do not affect moral rights or
fair use/fair dealing is a nice balance.
I'm not sure the licenses need to be specific about the details.
- Rob.
_______________________________________________
List info and archives at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses
Unsubscribe at http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/cc-licenses
In consideration of people subscribed to this list to participate
in the CC licenses http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0 development
process, please direct unrelated discussions to the cc-community list
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing,
Gisle Hannemyr, 05/01/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing,
Rob Myers, 05/01/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing,
Sarah Pearson, 05/02/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing, Luis Villa, 05/02/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing,
Sarah Pearson, 05/02/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing, pcreso, 05/02/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing,
Christopher Covington, 05/02/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing,
Gisle Hannemyr, 05/03/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing, Rob Myers, 05/05/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing, Christopher Covington, 05/09/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing, Rob Myers, 05/03/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing,
Gisle Hannemyr, 05/03/2012
- Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing, Francesco Poli, 05/02/2012
-
Re: [cc-licenses] Disclaimers for works of opinion as an incentive to free licensing,
Rob Myers, 05/01/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.